DBPK.DE vs. EXUS.DE
DBPK.DE (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Inverse Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and EXUS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD) are both exchange-traded funds - DBPK.DE is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Short Leverage (-2x) Index, while EXUS.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DBPK.DE returned -23.56% vs 25.65% for EXUS.DE. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. DBPK.DE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EXUS.DE.
Performance
DBPK.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBPK.DE achieves a -11.09% return, which is significantly lower than EXUS.DE's 13.41% return.
DBPK.DE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- 6M
- -12.79%
- YTD
- -11.09%
- 1Y
- -23.56%
- 3Y*
- -26.50%
- 5Y*
- -19.09%
- 10Y*
- -27.15%
EXUS.DE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- YTD
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBPK.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DBPK.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Inverse Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | -11.09% | -34.12% | -14.12% |
EXUS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD | 13.41% | 17.80% | 4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBPK.DE and EXUS.DE is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2024 | -0.64 |
The correlation between DBPK.DE and EXUS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.68 to -0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBPK.DE vs. EXUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBPK.DE
EXUS.DE
DBPK.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Inverse Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBPK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBPK.DE | EXUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.38 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 2.94 | -3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 11.77 | -13.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBPK.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBPK.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than EXUS.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBPK.DE and EXUS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBPK.DE | EXUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.58% | -16.21% | -83.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.27% | -8.67% | -21.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.56% | 0.00% | -99.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.93% | -1.75% | -85.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.61% | 2.17% | +14.44% |
Volatility
DBPK.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Inverse Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBPK.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE) at 3.18%. This indicates that DBPK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXUS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBPK.DE | EXUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 3.18% | +5.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.00% | 10.31% | +10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.58% | 12.59% | +13.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.45% | 13.36% | +22.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.85% | 13.36% | +21.49% |
DBPK.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBPK.DE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EXUS.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBPK.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBPK.DE nor EXUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBPK.DE and EXUS.DE have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EXUS.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EXUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DBPK.DE.
DBPK.DE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while EXUS.DE is Global Equities. DBPK.DE tracks S&P 500 Short Leverage (-2x) Index, while EXUS.DE tracks MSCI World ex USA index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DBPK.DE and 0.15% for EXUS.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBPK.DE and EXUS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer