DBPIX vs. DBLSX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DBPIX (DWS Short Duration Fund) and DBLSX (DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, DBPIX returned 2.81%/yr vs 2.87%/yr for DBLSX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBPIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBLSX.

Performance

DBPIX vs. DBLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Short Duration Fund (DBPIX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBPIX achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than DBLSX's 1.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBPIX having a 2.81% annualized return and DBLSX not far ahead at 2.87%.

DBPIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.49%
• 6M: 0.99%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: 5.40%
• 5Y*: 2.44%
• 10Y*: 2.81%

DBLSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 4.51%
• 3Y*: 5.51%
• 5Y*: 3.17%
• 10Y*: 2.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBPIX vs. DBLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBPIX DWS Short Duration Fund	0.49%	7.40%	5.14%	5.23%	-5.02%	0.29%	5.12%	5.87%	0.69%	2.61%
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund	1.06%	5.74%	5.32%	6.76%	-2.69%	0.70%	2.02%	4.73%	1.40%	2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DBPIX and DBLSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2011	0.48

The correlation between DBPIX and DBLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DBPIX vs. DBLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBPIX

DBPIX Risk / Return Rank: 65
DBPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
DBPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
DBPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DBPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DBPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

DBLSX

DBLSX Risk / Return Rank: 97
DBLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DBLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
DBLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
DBLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DBLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBPIX vs. DBLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Short Duration Fund (DBPIX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBPIX	DBLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	3.76	-1.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.95	6.30	-2.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	2.06	-0.56
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	6.37	-3.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.14	29.20	-19.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBPIX vs. DBLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is lower than the DBLSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBPIX and DBLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBPIX	DBLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	3.76	-1.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.02	2.28	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.30	0.04	+1.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.69	0.05	+1.64

Drawdowns

DBPIX vs. DBLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBPIX drawdown since its inception was -8.93%, smaller than the maximum DBLSX drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBPIX and DBLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBPIX	DBLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.93%	-57.22%	+48.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.64%	-0.72%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.64%	-0.72%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.00%	-4.71%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.54%	-57.22%	+48.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-45.00%	+44.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.66%	-31.51%	+30.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.50%	0.16%	+0.34%

Volatility

DBPIX vs. DBLSX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Short Duration Fund (DBPIX) has a higher volatility of 0.64% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) at 0.42%. This indicates that DBPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBPIX	DBLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.64%	0.42%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.51%	0.89%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05%	1.21%	+0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.40%	1.39%	+1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.17%	63.99%	-61.82%

DBPIX vs. DBLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBPIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLSX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBPIX vs. DBLSX - Dividend Comparison

DBPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than DBLSX's 4.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund	4.55%	4.64%	5.09%	4.49%	2.50%	1.72%	2.37%	3.21%	2.92%	2.42%	2.52%	2.47%
DBPIX DWS Short Duration Fund	4.30%	5.55%	4.41%	2.99%	1.86%	1.79%	2.99%	3.13%	2.81%	2.82%	2.84%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBPIX and DBLSX in my portfolio?

DBPIX and DBLSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBPIX or DBLSX?

DBPIX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to DBLSX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBPIX dropped -8.93% vs DBLSX's -57.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.