PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBPD.DE vs. DES2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBPD.DE vs. DES2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ShortDAX x2 Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBPD.DE) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF (DES2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBPD.DE achieves a -4.38% return, which is significantly higher than DES2.DE's -5.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBPD.DE having a -22.88% annualized return and DES2.DE not far behind at -23.54%.


DBPD.DE

1D
0.73%
1M
0.95%
6M
1.49%
YTD
-4.38%
1Y
-4.76%
3Y*
-23.21%
5Y*
-19.24%
10Y*
-22.88%

DES2.DE

1D
0.69%
1M
1.00%
6M
0.85%
YTD
-5.08%
1Y
-6.12%
3Y*
-24.13%
5Y*
-19.98%
10Y*
-23.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBPD.DE vs. DES2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBPD.DE
Xtrackers ShortDAX x2 Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)
-4.38%-35.14%-23.51%-28.08%9.77%-31.09%-33.90%-40.89%36.84%-25.87%
DES2.DE
L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF
-5.08%-35.92%-24.73%-28.32%8.81%-31.47%-34.46%-41.49%35.04%-25.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DBPD.DE and DES2.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2010

0.99

The correlation between DBPD.DE and DES2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBPD.DE vs. DES2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBPD.DE
DBPD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DBPD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBPD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBPD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DBPD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBPD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DES2.DE
DES2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DES2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DES2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBPD.DE vs. DES2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ShortDAX x2 Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBPD.DE) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF (DES2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBPD.DEDES2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.99

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

-0.23

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.38

-0.49

+0.11

DBPD.DE vs. DES2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBPD.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is comparable to the DES2.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBPD.DE and DES2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBPD.DE vs. DES2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBPD.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.15%, roughly equal to the maximum DES2.DE drawdown of -99.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBPD.DE and DES2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBPD.DEDES2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.15%

-99.34%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.26%

-26.29%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.61%

-66.97%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.96%

-77.94%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.89%

-93.47%

+0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.08%

-99.29%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.66%

-83.30%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.43%

12.50%

-0.07%

Volatility

DBPD.DE vs. DES2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers ShortDAX x2 Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBPD.DE) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF (DES2.DE) have volatilities of 9.36% and 9.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBPD.DEDES2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.36%

9.19%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.34%

27.27%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.43%

32.34%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.33%

34.53%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.18%

36.31%

-0.13%

DBPD.DE vs. DES2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBPD.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DES2.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBPD.DE vs. DES2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBPD.DE nor DES2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, DBPD.DE and DES2.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, DES2.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DES2.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBPD.DE.

DBPD.DE tracks ShortDAX Leverage (2x) Index, while DES2.DE tracks ShortDAX x2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBPD.DE and 0.50% for DES2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBPD.DE and DES2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer