PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBP vs. ACLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBP vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DBP having a 2.13% return and ACLO slightly higher at 2.21%.


DBP

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
2.13%
6M
8.68%
1Y
42.65%
3Y*
32.54%
5Y*
17.43%
10Y*
12.31%

ACLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.58%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBP vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DBP
Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund
2.13%73.43%-0.20%
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
2.21%5.32%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DBP and ACLO is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBP vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBP
DBP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBP Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBP Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ACLO
ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBP vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBPACLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-13.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

3.41

-2.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

19.90

-18.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

164.37

-160.37

DBP vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBP Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBP and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBPACLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

7.29

-5.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

5.10

-4.67

Drawdowns

DBP vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBP drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBP and ACLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBPACLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.89%

-1.01%

-52.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.48%

-0.27%

-25.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.04%

0.00%

-23.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-0.05%

-25.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.67%

0.03%

+10.64%

Volatility

DBP vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that DBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBPACLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

0.14%

+7.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.87%

0.57%

+29.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.57%

0.73%

+31.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.91%

1.08%

+19.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

1.08%

+17.64%

DBP vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBP vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

DBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than ACLO's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
4.91%4.87%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBP
Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund
2.38%2.44%4.21%4.47%0.45%0.00%0.00%1.26%1.24%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBP and ACLO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBP has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBP dropped -53.89% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

On 1-year performance, DBP leads with 42.65% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBP has performed better with a 42.65% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBP.

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 2.38% for DBP.

DBP is categorized as Precious Metals, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBP and 0.20% for ACLO.

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBP and ACLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer