PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBO vs. BZ=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBO vs. BZ=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DBO vs. BZ=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
55.98%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%
BZ=F
Crude Oil Brent
64.83%-18.48%-3.12%-10.32%10.45%50.15%-21.52%22.68%-19.55%17.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBO achieves a 55.98% return, which is significantly lower than BZ=F's 64.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DBO has outperformed BZ=F with an annualized return of 11.62%, while BZ=F has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.


DBO

1D
-3.25%
1M
23.41%
YTD
55.98%
6M
47.63%
1Y
37.53%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
14.79%
10Y*
11.62%

BZ=F

1D
-15.25%
1M
29.02%
YTD
64.83%
6M
53.48%
1Y
34.65%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBO vs. BZ=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BZ=F
BZ=F Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BZ=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BZ=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BZ=F Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BZ=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BZ=F Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBO vs. BZ=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBOBZ=FDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

0.72

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

1.17

+0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.20

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.69

3.87

-0.17

DBO vs. BZ=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBO Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the BZ=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBO and BZ=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBOBZ=FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

0.72

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.24

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.25

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.14

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between DBO and BZ=F is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

DBO vs. BZ=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBO drawdown since its inception was -90.18%, roughly equal to the maximum BZ=F drawdown of -86.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBO and BZ=F.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DBOBZ=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.18%

-86.77%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

-23.58%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

-53.96%

+16.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

-77.60%

+15.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.95%

-31.34%

-27.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.32%

-41.03%

-21.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.16%

13.39%

-3.23%

Volatility

DBO vs. BZ=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) is 16.15%, while Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) has a volatility of 32.42%. This indicates that DBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BZ=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DBOBZ=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.15%

32.42%

-16.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.38%

37.17%

-11.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.04%

42.17%

-6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.73%

35.75%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.53%

38.57%

-7.04%