PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBMYX vs. DRTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBMYX vs. DRTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX) and BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBMYX achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly higher than DRTHX's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, DBMYX has underperformed DRTHX with an annualized return of 11.31%, while DRTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.88% annualized return.


DBMYX

1D
2.03%
1M
-5.37%
6M
0.55%
YTD
8.30%
1Y
16.71%
3Y*
10.50%
5Y*
-0.55%
10Y*
11.31%
ALL TIME*
9.99%

DRTHX

1D
2.35%
1M
0.23%
6M
6.27%
YTD
7.29%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
14.88%
ALL TIME*
7.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DBMYX vs. DRTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBMYX
BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y
8.30%11.94%10.09%15.63%-33.11%-4.44%68.62%39.27%-1.35%26.80%
DRTHX
BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund
7.29%15.96%39.07%24.01%-23.10%26.71%24.21%34.01%-4.54%15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DBMYX and DRTHX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.79

The correlation between DBMYX and DRTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBMYX vs. DRTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBMYX
DBMYX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
DBMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

DRTHX
DRTHX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DRTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
DRTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBMYX vs. DRTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX) and BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBMYXDRTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.17

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.25

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.97

5.22

-3.25

DBMYX vs. DRTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBMYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the DRTHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMYX and DRTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBMYX vs. DRTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMYX drawdown since its inception was -48.24%, smaller than the maximum DRTHX drawdown of -63.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMYX and DRTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBMYXDRTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.24%

-63.27%

+15.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.58%

-10.66%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.20%

-21.55%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.79%

-27.58%

-18.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.24%

-31.34%

-16.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.74%

-1.20%

-11.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-17.34%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.44%

2.55%

+3.89%

Volatility

DBMYX vs. DRTHX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX) at 4.15%. This indicates that DBMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBMYXDRTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

4.15%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.18%

11.17%

+6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.48%

14.13%

+8.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.73%

18.74%

+5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.35%

18.46%

+5.89%

DBMYX vs. DRTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBMYX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than DRTHX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBMYX vs. DRTHX - Dividend Comparison

DBMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.26%, more than DRTHX's 9.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBMYX
BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y
47.26%51.19%0.43%0.00%0.00%8.97%7.86%0.00%8.66%9.12%2.20%6.55%
DRTHX
BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund
9.91%10.63%17.93%3.41%12.94%4.19%3.13%2.31%4.74%26.74%5.37%15.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBMYX and DRTHX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBMYX has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to DRTHX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBMYX dropped -48.24% vs DRTHX's -63.27%.

DRTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBMYX and DRTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer