DBMFE.PA vs. GOLD.AS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DBMFE.PA (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Fund R EUR UCITS ETF Acc) and GOLD.AS (Amundi Physical Gold ETC C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBMFE.PA is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by iM Global Partner, while GOLD.AS is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LMBA Gold Price PM USD. DBMFE.PA is actively managed, while GOLD.AS is passively managed. Over the past year, DBMFE.PA returned 28.35% vs 30.12% for GOLD.AS. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBMFE.PA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GOLD.AS.

Performance

DBMFE.PA vs. GOLD.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iMGP DBi Managed Futures Fund R EUR UCITS ETF Acc (DBMFE.PA) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DBMFE.PA is traded in EUR, while GOLD.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GOLD.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBMFE.PA achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD.AS's 4.78% return.

DBMFE.PA

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 14.28%
• 1Y: 28.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GOLD.AS

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -1.71%
• YTD: 4.78%
• 6M: 6.30%
• 1Y: 30.12%
• 3Y*: 28.06%
• 5Y*: 19.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBMFE.PA vs. GOLD.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DBMFE.PA iMGP DBi Managed Futures Fund R EUR UCITS ETF Acc	12.65%	8.56%
GOLD.AS Amundi Physical Gold ETC C	4.78%	26.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DBMFE.PA and GOLD.AS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

DBMFE.PA vs. GOLD.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMFE.PA

DBMFE.PA Risk / Return Rank: 52
DBMFE.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
DBMFE.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
DBMFE.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
DBMFE.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DBMFE.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 49

GOLD.AS

GOLD.AS Risk / Return Rank: 35
GOLD.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GOLD.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
GOLD.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GOLD.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
GOLD.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBMFE.PA vs. GOLD.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Fund R EUR UCITS ETF Acc (DBMFE.PA) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBMFE.PA	GOLD.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.23	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	1.65	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.25	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	1.72	+2.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.14	4.51	+3.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBMFE.PA vs. GOLD.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBMFE.PA Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the GOLD.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMFE.PA and GOLD.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBMFE.PA	GOLD.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	1.23	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.12	-0.07

Drawdowns

DBMFE.PA vs. GOLD.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMFE.PA drawdown since its inception was -7.01%, smaller than the maximum GOLD.AS drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMFE.PA and GOLD.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBMFE.PA	GOLD.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.01%	-18.25%	+11.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.01%	-17.29%	+10.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-15.10%	+13.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.01%	-5.64%	+2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	6.63%	-3.17%

Volatility

DBMFE.PA vs. GOLD.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Fund R EUR UCITS ETF Acc (DBMFE.PA) is 3.81%, while Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that DBMFE.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLD.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBMFE.PA	GOLD.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	5.71%	-1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.36%	21.43%	-10.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.01%	24.26%	-6.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.70%	16.62%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.70%	16.32%	+1.38%

DBMFE.PA vs. GOLD.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBMFE.PA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GOLD.AS's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBMFE.PA vs. GOLD.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBMFE.PA nor GOLD.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBMFE.PA and GOLD.AS in my portfolio?

DBMFE.PA and GOLD.AS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DBMFE.PA or GOLD.AS?

On fees, GOLD.AS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBMFE.PA or GOLD.AS?

GOLD.AS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DBMFE.PA.

What is the main difference between DBMFE.PA and GOLD.AS?

DBMFE.PA is categorized as Hedge Fund, while GOLD.AS is Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partner and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DBMFE.PA and 0.12% for GOLD.AS.