DBMFE.PA vs. AUM5.DE
DBMFE.PA (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Fund R EUR UCITS ETF Acc) and AUM5.DE (Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - DBMFE.PA is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by iM Global Partner, while AUM5.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. DBMFE.PA is actively managed, while AUM5.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, DBMFE.PA returned 28.35% vs 25.66% for AUM5.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBMFE.PA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AUM5.DE.
Performance
DBMFE.PA vs. AUM5.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBMFE.PA achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than AUM5.DE's 11.38% return.
DBMFE.PA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUM5.DE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.11%
DBMFE.PA vs. AUM5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DBMFE.PA iMGP DBi Managed Futures Fund R EUR UCITS ETF Acc | 12.65% | 8.56% |
AUM5.DE Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR | 11.38% | 13.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBMFE.PA and AUM5.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBMFE.PA vs. AUM5.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBMFE.PA
AUM5.DE
DBMFE.PA vs. AUM5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Fund R EUR UCITS ETF Acc (DBMFE.PA) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBMFE.PA | AUM5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.41 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 3.57 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.14 | 12.74 | -4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBMFE.PA | AUM5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.20 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.96 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
DBMFE.PA vs. AUM5.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBMFE.PA drawdown since its inception was -7.01%, smaller than the maximum AUM5.DE drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMFE.PA and AUM5.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBMFE.PA | AUM5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -33.66% | +26.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -7.15% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.46% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -4.00% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.01% | +1.45% |
Volatility
DBMFE.PA vs. AUM5.DE - Volatility Comparison
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Fund R EUR UCITS ETF Acc (DBMFE.PA) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that DBMFE.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUM5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBMFE.PA | AUM5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 2.63% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.36% | 7.61% | +3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 11.64% | +6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 15.19% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 16.07% | +1.63% |
DBMFE.PA vs. AUM5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBMFE.PA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AUM5.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBMFE.PA vs. AUM5.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBMFE.PA nor AUM5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBMFE.PA and AUM5.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUM5.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUM5.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DBMFE.PA.
DBMFE.PA is categorized as Hedge Fund, while AUM5.DE is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partner and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DBMFE.PA and 0.15% for AUM5.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBMFE.PA and AUM5.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer