DBLLX vs. EMLIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DBLLX (DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund) and EMLIX (MFS Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, DBLLX returned 3.53%/yr vs 3.30%/yr for EMLIX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBLLX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for EMLIX.

Performance

DBLLX vs. EMLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) and MFS Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (EMLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBLLX achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than EMLIX's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLLX has outperformed EMLIX with an annualized return of 3.53%, while EMLIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.30% annualized return.

DBLLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 6.99%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: 3.53%

EMLIX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 1.31%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 10.09%
• 3Y*: 7.17%
• 5Y*: 1.99%
• 10Y*: 3.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBLLX vs. EMLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund	1.10%	7.86%	7.20%	7.00%	-5.05%	-0.21%	3.53%	8.57%	-0.04%	4.20%
EMLIX MFS Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund	1.31%	19.53%	-4.66%	12.67%	-10.19%	-7.97%	2.68%	15.91%	-5.99%	14.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DBLLX and EMLIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2014	0.35

Return for Risk

DBLLX vs. EMLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBLLX

DBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 98
DBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

EMLIX

EMLIX Risk / Return Rank: 26
EMLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
EMLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
EMLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
EMLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
EMLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBLLX vs. EMLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) and MFS Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (EMLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBLLX	EMLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.80	1.60	+3.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	8.78	2.28	+6.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.63	1.32	+1.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.98	1.49	+4.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	27.44	5.00	+22.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBLLX vs. EMLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBLLX Sharpe Ratio is 4.80, which is higher than the EMLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBLLX and EMLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBLLX	EMLIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.80	1.60	+3.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.79	0.26	+1.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.86	0.25	+1.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.70	0.08	+1.63

Drawdowns

DBLLX vs. EMLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBLLX drawdown since its inception was -10.13%, smaller than the maximum EMLIX drawdown of -34.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLLX and EMLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBLLX	EMLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.13%	-34.15%	+24.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.92%	-6.80%	+5.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.35%	-9.34%	+7.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.13%	-24.72%	+14.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.13%	-33.42%	+23.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-3.27%	+3.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-16.53%	+15.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	2.02%	-1.82%

Volatility

DBLLX vs. EMLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) is 0.42%, while MFS Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (EMLIX) has a volatility of 2.26%. This indicates that DBLLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBLLX	EMLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.42%	2.26%	-1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.90%	5.58%	-4.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15%	6.36%	-5.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.94%	7.60%	-5.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.90%	13.34%	-11.44%

DBLLX vs. EMLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBLLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLIX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBLLX vs. EMLIX - Dividend Comparison

DBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than EMLIX's 3.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund	5.08%	5.27%	4.70%	3.74%	2.41%	2.15%	2.61%	4.93%	2.87%	3.00%	3.19%	3.77%
EMLIX MFS Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund	3.38%	3.48%	5.32%	3.64%	3.60%	4.49%	4.13%	4.71%	5.60%	4.48%	4.59%	6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBLLX and EMLIX in my portfolio?

DBLLX and EMLIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBLLX or EMLIX?

EMLIX has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to DBLLX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLLX dropped -10.13% vs EMLIX's -34.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.