DBLLX vs. EDF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DBLLX (DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund) and EDF (Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, DBLLX returned 3.53%/yr vs 4.94%/yr for EDF. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBLLX charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for EDF.

Performance

DBLLX vs. EDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBLLX achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than EDF's 14.37% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLLX has underperformed EDF with an annualized return of 3.53%, while EDF has yielded a comparatively higher 4.94% annualized return.

DBLLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 6.99%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: 3.53%

EDF

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 14.37%
• 6M: 17.21%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 27.49%
• 5Y*: 5.04%
• 10Y*: 4.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBLLX vs. EDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund	1.10%	7.86%	7.20%	7.00%	-5.05%	-0.21%	3.53%	8.57%	-0.04%	4.20%
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund	14.37%	22.24%	25.54%	21.63%	-27.96%	-8.47%	-31.14%	45.06%	-18.24%	24.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DBLLX and EDF is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2014	0.22

The correlation between DBLLX and EDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DBLLX vs. EDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBLLX

DBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 98
DBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

EDF

EDF Risk / Return Rank: 38
EDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EDF Omega Ratio Rank: 32
EDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
EDF Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBLLX vs. EDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBLLX	EDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.80	1.67	+3.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	8.78	2.47	+6.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.63	1.30	+1.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.98	2.53	+3.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	27.44	9.68	+17.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBLLX vs. EDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBLLX Sharpe Ratio is 4.80, which is higher than the EDF Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBLLX and EDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBLLX	EDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.80	1.67	+3.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.79	0.20	+1.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.86	0.16	+1.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.70	0.13	+1.58

Drawdowns

DBLLX vs. EDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBLLX drawdown since its inception was -10.13%, smaller than the maximum EDF drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLLX and EDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBLLX	EDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.13%	-64.23%	+54.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.92%	-9.44%	+8.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.35%	-24.32%	+22.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.13%	-52.53%	+42.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.13%	-64.23%	+54.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-6.20%	+6.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-21.48%	+20.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	2.46%	-2.26%

Volatility

DBLLX vs. EDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) is 0.42%, while Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that DBLLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBLLX	EDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.42%	4.95%	-4.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.90%	11.48%	-10.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15%	14.39%	-13.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.94%	25.64%	-23.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.90%	30.69%	-28.79%

DBLLX vs. EDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBLLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EDF's 1.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBLLX vs. EDF - Dividend Comparison

DBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, less than EDF's 13.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund	5.08%	5.27%	4.70%	3.74%	2.41%	2.15%	2.61%	4.93%	2.87%	3.00%	3.19%	3.77%
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund	13.43%	14.49%	15.32%	16.71%	17.31%	12.91%	16.46%	15.67%	19.37%	13.58%	14.75%	17.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBLLX and EDF in my portfolio?

DBLLX and EDF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBLLX or EDF?

EDF has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to DBLLX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLLX dropped -10.13% vs EDF's -64.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.