PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBLDX vs. VGAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBLDX vs. VGAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund (DBLDX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBLDX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than VGAVX's 1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLDX has underperformed VGAVX with an annualized return of -0.81%, while VGAVX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.70% annualized return.


DBLDX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.92%
YTD
0.13%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
0.81%
5Y*
-4.73%
10Y*
-0.81%

VGAVX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.07%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.95%
1Y
11.27%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
3.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBLDX vs. VGAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBLDX
DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund
0.13%6.25%-4.42%3.79%-29.25%-3.91%14.17%14.19%-0.79%6.75%
VGAVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.65%12.98%6.27%10.44%-16.68%-1.74%5.82%14.01%-2.77%8.45%

Correlation

The correlation between DBLDX and VGAVX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2014

0.42

Over the past year, DBLDX and VGAVX have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBLDX vs. VGAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBLDX
DBLDX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DBLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VGAVX
VGAVX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VGAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBLDX vs. VGAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund (DBLDX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBLDXVGAVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.58

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

2.92

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

11.71

-9.27

DBLDX vs. VGAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBLDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the VGAVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBLDX and VGAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBLDXVGAVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

2.82

-2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

0.37

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.58

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.69

-0.68

Drawdowns

DBLDX vs. VGAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBLDX drawdown since its inception was -45.96%, which is greater than VGAVX's maximum drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLDX and VGAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBLDXVGAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.96%

-26.77%

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-3.97%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.52%

-7.11%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.48%

-26.77%

-13.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.96%

-26.77%

-19.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.44%

-0.09%

-34.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.55%

-4.68%

-12.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

0.99%

+1.65%

Volatility

DBLDX vs. VGAVX - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund (DBLDX) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGAVX) at 1.53%. This indicates that DBLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBLDXVGAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

1.53%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.13%

3.32%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.76%

4.12%

+4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.38%

6.32%

+7.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.27%

6.37%

+5.90%

DBLDX vs. VGAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBLDX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VGAVX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBLDX vs. VGAVX - Dividend Comparison

DBLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than VGAVX's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLDX
DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund
5.40%5.14%4.94%3.35%3.48%2.93%9.77%7.60%3.14%3.36%3.15%3.23%
VGAVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
5.79%5.88%6.56%5.50%5.29%4.27%4.20%4.60%4.54%4.62%4.73%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBLDX and VGAVX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBLDX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to VGAVX (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLDX dropped -45.96% vs VGAVX's -26.77%.

VGAVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBLDX and VGAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer