PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBL vs. BWDTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBL vs. BWDTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund (DBL) and Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DBL vs. BWDTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBL
DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund
-2.13%7.16%10.05%13.11%-15.83%4.61%3.93%16.74%-6.24%4.49%
BWDTX
Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund
0.05%7.14%4.92%9.80%-3.16%2.32%4.66%7.94%-0.51%4.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBL achieves a -2.13% return, which is significantly lower than BWDTX's 0.05% return.


DBL

1D
2.82%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
-2.13%
6M
-2.13%
1Y
1.84%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
2.29%

BWDTX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
0.05%
6M
1.65%
1Y
5.72%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
4.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBL vs. BWDTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBL has a 2.43% expense ratio, which is higher than BWDTX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DBL vs. BWDTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBL
DBL Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
DBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBL Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BWDTX
BWDTX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BWDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BWDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBL vs. BWDTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund (DBL) and Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBLBWDTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.23

2.31

-2.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.40

2.78

-2.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.70

-0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

2.58

-2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.13

10.82

-9.69

DBL vs. BWDTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the BWDTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBL and BWDTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBLBWDTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

2.31

-2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

1.86

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

1.76

-1.43

Correlation

The correlation between DBL and BWDTX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DBL vs. BWDTX - Dividend Comparison

DBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.04%, more than BWDTX's 5.74% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBL
DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund
9.04%8.66%8.52%8.60%8.89%7.17%8.69%6.83%10.27%9.03%8.68%9.35%
BWDTX
Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund
5.74%5.70%4.13%5.51%3.80%3.20%3.18%3.47%4.18%2.90%1.35%0.00%

Drawdowns

DBL vs. BWDTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBL drawdown since its inception was -26.45%, which is greater than BWDTX's maximum drawdown of -10.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBL and BWDTX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DBLBWDTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.45%

-10.06%

-16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-1.22%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.54%

-6.35%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-0.85%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-0.69%

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.53%

+1.15%

Volatility

DBL vs. BWDTX - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund (DBL) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX) at 0.59%. This indicates that DBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWDTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DBLBWDTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

0.59%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.51%

0.88%

+4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.04%

1.93%

+6.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.59%

2.19%

+9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.62%

2.21%

+12.41%