PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBIRX vs. SSAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBIRX vs. SSAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Bond Market Index Fund (DBIRX) and State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio (SSAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBIRX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than SSAFX's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, DBIRX has underperformed SSAFX with an annualized return of 1.26%, while SSAFX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.83% annualized return.


DBIRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.16%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
3.46%
5Y*
-0.31%
10Y*
1.26%

SSAFX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.33%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
27.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBIRX vs. SSAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBIRX
BNY Mellon Bond Market Index Fund
0.25%7.06%0.58%4.77%-13.66%-2.09%7.54%8.50%-0.15%3.36%
SSAFX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio
0.42%6.81%1.34%5.61%-13.30%-1.72%978.57%8.69%-0.12%3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DBIRX and SSAFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2014

0.93

The correlation between DBIRX and SSAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBIRX vs. SSAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBIRX
DBIRX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DBIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DBIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SSAFX
SSAFX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SSAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBIRX vs. SSAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Bond Market Index Fund (DBIRX) and State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio (SSAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBIRXSSAFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

1.45

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

2.17

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

1.96

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.12

6.00

-0.88

DBIRX vs. SSAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the SSAFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBIRX and SSAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBIRXSSAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.45

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.01

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.10

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.09

+0.79

Drawdowns

DBIRX vs. SSAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBIRX drawdown since its inception was -19.60%, roughly equal to the maximum SSAFX drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBIRX and SSAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBIRXSSAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.60%

-18.74%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-2.74%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.35%

-6.09%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

-18.10%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.60%

-18.74%

-0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.87%

-2.62%

-2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-4.41%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.90%

+0.11%

Volatility

DBIRX vs. SSAFX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Bond Market Index Fund (DBIRX) and State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio (SSAFX) have volatilities of 1.32% and 1.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBIRXSSAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.29%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

2.65%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

3.74%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.02%

5.95%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

277.51%

-272.53%

DBIRX vs. SSAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBIRX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAFX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DBIRX vs. SSAFX - Dividend Comparison

DBIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than SSAFX's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBIRX
BNY Mellon Bond Market Index Fund
3.84%3.78%3.17%2.73%2.17%2.54%2.72%2.77%2.79%2.52%2.96%2.95%
SSAFX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio
4.16%3.70%3.76%3.16%2.49%1.90%2.41%2.88%2.82%2.42%2.21%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DBIRX and SSAFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DBIRX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to SSAFX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBIRX dropped -19.60% vs SSAFX's -18.74%.

SSAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBIRX and SSAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer