PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBIRX vs. FTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBIRX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Bond Market Index Fund (DBIRX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBIRX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's -0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, DBIRX has underperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 1.19%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.95% annualized return.


DBIRX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.47%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
-0.47%
10Y*
1.19%

FTHRX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.22%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
0.16%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
1.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBIRX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBIRX
BNY Mellon Bond Market Index Fund
0.03%7.06%0.58%4.77%-13.66%-2.09%7.54%8.50%-0.15%3.36%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.24%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DBIRX and FTHRX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 1993

0.89

The correlation between DBIRX and FTHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBIRX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBIRX
DBIRX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DBIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DBIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBIRX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Bond Market Index Fund (DBIRX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBIRXFTHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.59

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.02

4.39

-0.37

DBIRX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBIRX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBIRX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBIRX drawdown since its inception was -19.60%, roughly equal to the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBIRX and FTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBIRXFTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.60%

-19.01%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-2.11%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.35%

-2.68%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

-13.18%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.60%

-13.25%

-6.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-1.48%

-3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-3.06%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

0.76%

+0.32%

Volatility

DBIRX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Bond Market Index Fund (DBIRX) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.87%. This indicates that DBIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBIRXFTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.87%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.95%

2.09%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

2.80%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

4.04%

+1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

3.40%

+1.58%

DBIRX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBIRX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBIRX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

DBIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than FTHRX's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBIRX
BNY Mellon Bond Market Index Fund
3.85%3.78%3.17%2.73%2.17%2.54%2.72%2.77%2.79%2.52%2.96%2.95%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.71%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DBIRX and FTHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DBIRX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to FTHRX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBIRX dropped -19.60% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

FTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBIRX and FTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer