DBEH vs. FLSP

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iM DBi Hedge Strategy ETF (DBEH) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP).

DBEH and FLSP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBEH is an actively managed fund by Litman Gregory Capital Partners LLC. It was launched on Dec 18, 2019. FLSP is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 18, 2019.

Performance

DBEH vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iM DBi Hedge Strategy ETF (DBEH) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DBEH vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBEH iM DBi Hedge Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	5.57%	7.23%	-6.05%	4.95%	23.41%	-0.51%
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF	1.97%	15.56%	11.75%	3.14%	0.44%	11.44%	-15.19%	0.90%

Returns By Period

DBEH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLSP

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -1.22%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 6M: 6.72%
• 1Y: 14.34%
• 3Y*: 10.71%
• 5Y*: 8.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEH vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEH has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSP's 0.65% expense ratio.

DBEH

iM DBi Hedge Strategy ETF

FLSP

Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF

Return for Risk

DBEH vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSP

FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 70
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEH vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iM DBi Hedge Strategy ETF (DBEH) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBEH	FLSP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.32	—

Correlation

The correlation between DBEH and FLSP is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DBEH vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison

DBEH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DBEH iM DBi Hedge Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.66%	3.05%	1.54%	17.43%	0.06%
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF	2.60%	2.65%	1.18%	1.19%	2.18%	1.19%	8.08%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DBEH	FLSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-22.75%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.26%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.42%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.47%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DBEH	FLSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.35%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	13.42%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.67%	—