DBEH vs. FFLS
Compare and contrast key facts about iM DBi Hedge Strategy ETF (DBEH) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS).
DBEH and FFLS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBEH is an actively managed fund by Litman Gregory Capital Partners LLC. It was launched on Dec 18, 2019. FFLS is an actively managed fund by The Future Fund. It was launched on Jun 20, 2023.
Performance
DBEH vs. FFLS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBEH vs. FFLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEH iM DBi Hedge Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.57% | 2.89% |
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF | -5.02% | 7.49% | 17.71% | 2.03% |
Returns By Period
DBEH
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFLS
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- -5.02%
- 6M
- -7.49%
- 1Y
- 0.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBEH vs. FFLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEH has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLS's 1.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBEH vs. FFLS — Risk / Return Rank
DBEH
FFLS
DBEH vs. FFLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iM DBi Hedge Strategy ETF (DBEH) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBEH | FFLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.68 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEH and FFLS is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DBEH vs. FFLS - Dividend Comparison
DBEH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEH iM DBi Hedge Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.66% | 3.05% | 1.54% | 17.43% | 0.06% |
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF | 6.92% | 6.58% | 3.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DBEH vs. FFLS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEH | FFLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -11.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -9.49% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.87% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.22% | — |
Volatility
DBEH vs. FFLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBEH | FFLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 9.26% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 11.19% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 11.19% | — |