DBC vs. VXUS
DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBC returned 9.54%/yr vs 9.44%/yr for VXUS. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DBC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
DBC vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 31.71% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 12.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBC having a 9.54% annualized return and VXUS not far behind at 9.44%.
DBC
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 20.55%
- YTD
- 31.71%
- 1Y
- 37.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.04%
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 27.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.92M | $29.19M | $34.33M | |
| $362.62M | $406.11M | $507.75M |
DBC vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 31.71% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 12.75% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBC and VXUS is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.37 |
The correlation between DBC and VXUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBC vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
DBC
VXUS
DBC vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBC | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.42 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 8.87 | -1.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBC vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBC | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.36% | -35.97% | -40.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.54% | -11.27% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -13.58% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -29.44% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | -35.97% | -5.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.81% | -2.84% | -20.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.07% | -8.16% | -37.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 3.07% | +1.93% |
Volatility
DBC vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 5.29%. This indicates that DBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBC | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 5.29% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.35% | 15.06% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.58% | 16.86% | +2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 16.35% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 17.03% | +0.84% |
DBC vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBC vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than VXUS's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.53% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.59% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBC and VXUS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to VXUS (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 10-year performance, DBC leads with 9.54% vs 9.44% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBC has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 9.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 2.53% for DBC.
DBC is categorized as Commodities, while VXUS is Global Equities. DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.05% for VXUS.
DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBC and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer