PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBC vs. UCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBC vs. UCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 35.47% return, which is significantly higher than UCON's 0.58% return.


DBC

1D
0.56%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
35.47%
6M
35.36%
1Y
45.90%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
9.10%

UCON

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.66%
1Y
5.50%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBC vs. UCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
35.47%8.10%2.18%-6.19%19.34%41.36%-7.84%11.84%-17.21%
UCON
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
0.58%7.00%4.69%7.72%-5.72%1.02%6.54%7.39%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DBC and UCON is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DBC and UCON has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.35, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

DBC vs. UCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBC
UCON

Financial Services

91.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

100.0%

Financial Services

DBC
91.5%
UCON

-

Basic Materials

DBC

-

UCON

-

Communication Services

DBC

-

UCON

-

Consumer Cyclical

DBC

-

UCON

-

Consumer Defensive

DBC

-

UCON

-

Energy

DBC

-

UCON

-

Healthcare

DBC

-

UCON

-

Industrials

DBC

-

UCON

-

Real Estate

DBC

-

UCON

-

Technology

DBC

-

UCON

-

Utilities

DBC

-

UCON
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBC vs. UCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

UCON
UCON Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UCON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCON Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCON Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
UCON Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCON Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBC vs. UCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBCUCONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.54

2.25

+4.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

8.74

+5.17

DBC vs. UCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBC Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the UCON Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBC and UCON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBCUCONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.85

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.71

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.63

-0.51

Drawdowns

DBC vs. UCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than UCON's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and UCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBCUCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.36%

-15.31%

-61.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-2.45%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

-2.85%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

-9.60%

-17.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.64%

-0.61%

-21.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.22%

-1.48%

-44.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

0.63%

+2.68%

Volatility

DBC vs. UCON - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) at 1.14%. This indicates that DBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBCUCONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

1.14%

+5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.75%

2.33%

+13.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.68%

2.98%

+15.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

3.89%

+15.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.81%

5.89%

+11.92%

DBC vs. UCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than UCON's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBC vs. UCON - Dividend Comparison

DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than UCON's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.46%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%
UCON
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
4.67%4.63%4.95%4.75%3.12%2.20%3.14%3.25%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBC and UCON have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBC has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to UCON (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs UCON's -15.31%.

On 5-year performance, DBC leads with 12.78% vs 2.76% for UCON. On fees, DBC is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, UCON has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBC has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 2.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBC is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for UCON.

UCON has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 2.46% for DBC.

DBC is categorized as Commodities, while UCON is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.86% for UCON.

DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBC and UCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer