PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAXX.L vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAXX.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor DAX (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (DAXX.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DAXX.L is traded in GBp, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAXX.L achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, DAXX.L has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 9.91%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.13% annualized return.


DAXX.L

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
0.50%
6M
2.40%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
9.91%

GLD

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
4.20%
6M
5.72%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
27.81%
5Y*
19.62%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAXX.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAXX.L
Lyxor DAX (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.50%28.48%13.18%17.11%-7.69%7.55%9.67%16.14%-17.07%16.46%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.99%52.02%28.87%7.06%11.03%-3.24%21.15%13.37%3.87%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DAXX.L and GLD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014

0.03

DAXX.L vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DAXX.L
GLD

Industrials

34.2%

-

Financial Services

20.5%

-

Technology

14.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%

-

Communication Services

6.4%

-

Healthcare

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

5.0%
100.0%

Utilities

4.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.0%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

DAXX.L
34.2%
GLD

-

Financial Services

DAXX.L
20.5%
GLD

-

Technology

DAXX.L
14.7%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

DAXX.L
7.1%
GLD

-

Communication Services

DAXX.L
6.4%
GLD

-

Healthcare

DAXX.L
5.7%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

DAXX.L
5.0%
GLD
100.0%

Utilities

DAXX.L
4.7%
GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

DAXX.L
1.0%
GLD

-

Real Estate

DAXX.L
0.9%
GLD

-

Energy

DAXX.L

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAXX.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAXX.L
DAXX.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DAXX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAXX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAXX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
DAXX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAXX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAXX.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor DAX (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (DAXX.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAXX.LGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.28

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

1.95

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

4.77

-3.52

DAXX.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAXX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAXX.L and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAXX.LGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

1.37

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.18

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.87

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.70

-0.23

Drawdowns

DAXX.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAXX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.41%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAXX.L and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAXX.LGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.41%

-41.89%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-17.78%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-17.78%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

-17.78%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-22.78%

-12.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-16.16%

+12.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-13.21%

+6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

7.24%

-3.18%

Volatility

DAXX.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor DAX (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (DAXX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 3.81%. This indicates that DAXX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAXX.LGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

3.81%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

21.73%

-9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

25.28%

-10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

16.70%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

16.22%

+1.80%

DAXX.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAXX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAXX.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAXX.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DAXX.L and GLD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DAXX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DAXX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

DAXX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while GLD is Gold. DAXX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for DAXX.L and 0.40% for GLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAXX.L and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer