PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAX vs. FLGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAX vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than FLGB's 11.77% return.


DAX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.29%
6M
1.41%
YTD
2.45%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
9.35%
ALL TIME*
7.68%

FLGB

1D
-0.59%
1M
3.07%
6M
6.65%
YTD
11.77%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.64M$2.14M$1.96M
$2.68M$2.31M$3.65M

DAX vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
2.45%39.00%10.55%23.62%-18.47%7.73%12.27%22.11%-22.92%-0.60%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
11.77%33.73%8.77%14.33%-6.00%17.14%-9.47%23.23%-11.60%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DAX and FLGB is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.74

The correlation between DAX and FLGB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

DAX vs. FLGB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DAX
FLGB

Industrials

36.0%
14.4%

Financial Services

20.5%
25.5%

Technology

14.3%
0.6%

Healthcare

6.5%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
4.9%

Communication Services

5.2%
2.5%

Basic Materials

4.7%
8.2%

Utilities

4.5%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
14.4%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.9%

Energy

-

10.0%

Industrials

DAX
36.0%
FLGB
14.4%

Financial Services

DAX
20.5%
FLGB
25.5%

Technology

DAX
14.3%
FLGB
0.6%

Healthcare

DAX
6.5%
FLGB
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DAX
6.4%
FLGB
4.9%

Communication Services

DAX
5.2%
FLGB
2.5%

Basic Materials

DAX
4.7%
FLGB
8.2%

Utilities

DAX
4.5%
FLGB
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

DAX
1.1%
FLGB
14.4%

Real Estate

DAX
0.9%
FLGB
0.9%

Energy

DAX

-

FLGB
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAX vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DAX
DAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGB
FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DAX vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DAXFLGBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.31

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

2.50

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

8.38

-6.87

DAX vs. FLGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the FLGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAX and FLGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DAX vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAX drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, which is greater than FLGB's maximum drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAX and FLGB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAXFLGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.58%

-42.61%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.82%

-10.26%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.03%

-13.13%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.92%

-25.90%

-13.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-0.59%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.43%

-6.62%

-3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

3.05%

+1.75%

Volatility

DAX vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison

Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) at 4.55%. This indicates that DAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAXFLGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

4.55%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.31%

12.83%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

14.78%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

16.59%

+3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

18.91%

+2.01%

DAX vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DAX vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison

DAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than FLGB's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
2.05%1.47%2.24%2.48%2.80%2.65%2.25%2.47%3.33%1.73%1.78%1.41%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
2.84%3.50%4.42%3.95%4.23%2.93%2.67%4.30%3.92%0.43%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAX and FLGB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FLGB (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAX dropped -45.58% vs FLGB's -42.61%.

On 5-year performance, FLGB leads with 12.51% vs 9.16% for DAX. On fees, FLGB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLGB has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLGB has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for DAX.

FLGB has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.05% for DAX.

DAX tracks DAX Index, while FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DAX and 0.09% for FLGB.

FLGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAX and FLGB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer