PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAVPX vs. GXXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAVPX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davenport Core Fund (DAVPX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAVPX achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly higher than GXXIX's 6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, DAVPX has underperformed GXXIX with an annualized return of 12.02%, while GXXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.74% annualized return.


DAVPX

1D
0.76%
1M
4.76%
YTD
7.61%
6M
6.66%
1Y
14.84%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
12.02%

GXXIX

1D
0.82%
1M
4.39%
YTD
6.73%
6M
5.69%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
14.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAVPX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAVPX
Davenport Core Fund
7.61%10.73%17.50%28.98%-20.01%22.90%13.78%32.89%-9.23%19.86%
GXXIX
abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
6.73%3.82%10.11%15.19%-26.55%81.37%29.56%36.96%-6.73%20.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DAVPX and GXXIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2011

0.93

The correlation between DAVPX and GXXIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAVPX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAVPX
DAVPX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DAVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DAVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

GXXIX
GXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAVPX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davenport Core Fund (DAVPX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAVPXGXXIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

1.12

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

1.64

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.20

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.13

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.55

4.36

+1.19

DAVPX vs. GXXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAVPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the GXXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAVPX and GXXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAVPXGXXIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.12

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.43

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.62

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.65

-0.21

Drawdowns

DAVPX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAVPX drawdown since its inception was -51.80%, which is greater than GXXIX's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAVPX and GXXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAVPXGXXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.80%

-33.65%

-18.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-11.78%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-19.74%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-33.65%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.99%

-33.65%

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-6.16%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

3.06%

-0.32%

Volatility

DAVPX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davenport Core Fund (DAVPX) is 2.47%, while abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that DAVPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAVPXGXXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

2.93%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

9.35%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

11.90%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

27.77%

-11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

23.72%

-5.89%

DAVPX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAVPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAVPX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison

DAVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than GXXIX's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAVPX
Davenport Core Fund
4.10%4.43%2.94%6.31%4.71%8.10%1.16%2.24%1.30%2.48%3.37%3.97%
GXXIX
abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
2.15%2.30%0.00%0.28%0.39%59.39%14.10%9.76%12.93%10.11%12.20%5.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DAVPX and GXXIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GXXIX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to DAVPX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAVPX dropped -51.80% vs GXXIX's -33.65%.

DAVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAVPX and GXXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer