DAUG vs. NAPR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DAUG (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August) and NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - DAUG is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while NAPR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DAUG returned 6.54%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for NAPR. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DAUG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NAPR.

Performance

DAUG vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAUG achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 9.87% return.

DAUG

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 5.81%
• YTD: 6.63%
• 1Y: 12.27%
• 3Y*: 10.67%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.91%

NAPR

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 0.19%
• 6M: 9.16%
• YTD: 9.87%
• 1Y: 14.91%
• 3Y*: 11.68%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DAUG FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August	$245.93K	$215.56K	$296.36K
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	$201.80K	$267.90K	$580.78K

DAUG vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DAUG FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August	6.63%	11.75%	12.00%	13.85%	-11.95%	6.71%	18.71%
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	9.87%	6.56%	13.29%	30.60%	-12.13%	9.09%	14.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DAUG and NAPR is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2020	0.78

The correlation between DAUG and NAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

DAUG vs. NAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DAUG	NAPR
Technology	37.9%	50.7%
Financial Services	11.7%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.0%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	12.5%
Healthcare	9.1%	5.1%
Industrials	8.4%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	8.7%
Energy	3.0%	0.7%
Utilities	2.3%	1.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.3%

Return for Risk

DAUG vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DAUG

DAUG Risk / Return Rank: 86
DAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
DAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 89

NAPR

NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 97
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DAUG vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DAUG	NAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	3.05	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	4.82	-1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.67	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	7.01	-4.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.98	33.97	-19.99

DAUG vs. NAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the NAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAUG and NAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DAUG vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAUG drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum NAPR drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAUG and NAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAUG	NAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.34%	-16.53%	+1.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.37%	-2.06%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.53%	-14.52%	+3.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.34%	-16.53%	+1.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.70%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.76%	-2.24%	-0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	0.43%	+0.40%

Volatility

DAUG vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) is 1.02%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) has a volatility of 2.01%. This indicates that DAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAUG	NAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	2.01%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.44%	4.10%	+0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.58%	4.73%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.08%	11.33%	-3.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.19%	10.55%	-1.36%

DAUG vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAUG vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAUG nor NAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAUG and NAPR in my portfolio?

DAUG and NAPR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAUG or NAPR?

NAPR has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to DAUG (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAUG dropped -15.34% vs NAPR's -16.53%.

Which ETF is better, DAUG or NAPR?

On 5-year performance, NAPR leads with 9.42% vs 6.54% for DAUG. On fees, NAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, DAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DAUG or NAPR?

Over the 5-year period, NAPR has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 6.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAUG or NAPR?

NAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DAUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAUG or NAPR?

DAUG and NAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DAUG and NAPR?

DAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NAPR is Nasdaq-100. DAUG tracks S&P 500, while NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DAUG and 0.79% for NAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.