DAUG vs. BITI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DAUG (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAUG is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DAUG returned 10.67%/yr vs -31.77%/yr for BITI. Their -0.36 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DAUG charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

DAUG vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAUG achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 27.11% return.

DAUG

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 5.81%
• YTD: 6.63%
• 1Y: 12.27%
• 3Y*: 10.67%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.91%

BITI

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: -2.58%
• 6M: 22.77%
• YTD: 27.11%
• 1Y: 58.64%
• 3Y*: -31.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -35.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	$24.10M	$26.49M	$38.71M
DAUG FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August	$245.93K	$215.56K	$296.36K

DAUG vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DAUG FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August	6.63%	11.75%	12.00%	13.85%	-3.30%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	27.11%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between DAUG and BITI is -0.48, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.48
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.36

The correlation between DAUG and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.48 (1 year) to -0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DAUG vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DAUG

DAUG Risk / Return Rank: 86
DAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
DAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 89

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 61
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DAUG vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DAUG	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.45	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	2.02	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.24	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	2.53	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.98	6.17	+7.81

DAUG vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAUG and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DAUG vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAUG drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAUG and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAUG	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.34%	-92.16%	+76.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.37%	-25.28%	+20.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.53%	-84.63%	+74.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-86.12%	+86.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.76%	-68.59%	+65.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	10.35%	-9.52%

Volatility

DAUG vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) is 1.02%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that DAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAUG	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	9.13%	-8.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.44%	33.31%	-28.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.58%	44.23%	-38.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.08%	52.03%	-43.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.19%	52.03%	-42.84%

DAUG vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAUG vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

DAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.30%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.17%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
DAUG FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAUG and BITI in my portfolio?

DAUG and BITI have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAUG or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to DAUG (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAUG dropped -15.34% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, DAUG or BITI?

On 3-year performance, DAUG leads with 10.67% vs -31.77% for BITI. On fees, DAUG is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DAUG or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, DAUG has performed better with a 10.67% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAUG or BITI?

DAUG is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAUG or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.17%, compared with 0.00% for DAUG.

What is the main difference between DAUG and BITI?

DAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. DAUG tracks S&P 500, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DAUG and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.