DASX vs. MVLL
DASX (Tradr 2X Long DASH Daily ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DASX is actively managed, while MVLL is passively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DASX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.
Performance
DASX vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DASX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVLL
- 1D
- 7.14%
- 1M
- 201.84%
- YTD
- 842.68%
- 6M
- 558.01%
- 1Y
- 1,215.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DASX vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DASX Tradr 2X Long DASH Daily ETF | -41.22% | -28.45% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 842.68% | -3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between DASX and MVLL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DASX vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank
DASX
MVLL
DASX vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long DASH Daily ETF (DASX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DASX | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 9.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 3.33 | — |
Drawdowns
DASX vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DASX | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -59.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -48.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -22.42% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.46% | — |
Volatility
DASX vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DASX | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 60.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 96.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 133.11% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 139.63% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 139.63% | — |
DASX vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DASX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DASX vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DASX nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DASX and MVLL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DASX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DASX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.
DASX and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for DASX and 1.50% for MVLL.
Find the right allocation for DASX and MVLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer