DAPP vs. REMX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DAPP (VanEck Digital Transformation ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAPP is a Blockchain fund tracking the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DAPP returned -0.90%/yr vs 3.96%/yr for REMX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAPP charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.

Performance

DAPP vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DAPP having a 22.81% return and REMX slightly lower at 22.66%.

DAPP

• 1D: -5.01%
• 1M: -4.56%
• YTD: 22.81%
• 6M: 13.79%
• 1Y: 31.22%
• 3Y*: 48.00%
• 5Y*: -0.90%
• 10Y*: —

REMX

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -6.35%
• YTD: 22.66%
• 6M: 19.10%
• 1Y: 131.97%
• 3Y*: 5.17%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAPP vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF	22.81%	15.03%	44.87%	285.02%	-85.60%	-45.88%
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	22.66%	92.95%	-35.02%	-19.18%	-31.13%	54.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DAPP and REMX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021	0.45

DAPP vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DAPP	REMX
Financial Services	62.8%	-
Technology	34.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DAPP vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAPP

DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 18
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 20
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 15

REMX

REMX Risk / Return Rank: 82
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAPP vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DAPP	REMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	2.66	-2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	3.00	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.37	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	5.68	-5.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.25	14.86	-13.61

DAPP vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAPP and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DAPP vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPP drawdown since its inception was -92.61%, roughly equal to the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP and REMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAPP	REMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.61%	-90.20%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.21%	-23.35%	-24.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.88%	-62.11%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.90%	-73.34%	-18.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.59%	-58.48%	+19.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.12%	-66.82%	+5.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.03%	8.91%	+16.12%

Volatility

DAPP vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a higher volatility of 18.24% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) at 16.68%. This indicates that DAPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAPP	REMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.24%	16.68%	+1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.19%	37.37%	+8.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.36%	50.00%	+12.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.14%	40.71%	+32.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.79%	37.15%	+35.64%

DAPP vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAPP has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAPP vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	0.00%	0.00%	10.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	1.43%	1.76%	2.56%	0.00%	1.56%	5.25%	0.81%	1.64%	12.43%	2.89%	2.23%	4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAPP and REMX in my portfolio?

DAPP and REMX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAPP or REMX?

DAPP has higher volatility (18.24%) compared to REMX (16.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAPP dropped -92.61% vs REMX's -90.20%.

Which ETF is better, DAPP or REMX?

On 5-year performance, REMX leads with 3.96% vs -0.90% for DAPP. On fees, DAPP is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, REMX has been the lower-risk option at 16.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DAPP or REMX?

Over the 5-year period, REMX has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -0.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAPP or REMX?

DAPP is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAPP or REMX?

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for DAPP.

What is the main difference between DAPP and REMX?

DAPP is categorized as Blockchain, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. DAPP tracks MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for DAPP and 0.59% for REMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.