DAPP.L vs. SPDM.L
DAPP.L (VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc) and SPDM.L (iShares Physical Palladium ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - DAPP.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SPDM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the London Palladium PM Fix. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DAPP.L returned -2.12%/yr vs -14.10%/yr for SPDM.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAPP.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPDM.L.
Performance
DAPP.L vs. SPDM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DAPP.L is traded in USD, while SPDM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPDM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAPP.L achieves a 29.21% return, which is significantly higher than SPDM.L's -15.75% return.
DAPP.L
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 5.89%
- YTD
- 29.21%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- 50.42%
- 3Y*
- 56.66%
- 5Y*
- -2.12%
- 10Y*
- —
SPDM.L
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -10.78%
- YTD
- -15.75%
- 6M
- -7.87%
- 1Y
- 34.13%
- 3Y*
- -2.29%
- 5Y*
- -14.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
DAPP.L vs. SPDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAPP.L VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 29.21% | 9.71% | 29.53% | 351.01% | -86.77% | -27.60% |
SPDM.L iShares Physical Palladium ETC | -15.75% | 74.44% | -19.00% | -38.04% | -5.71% | -34.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAPP.L and SPDM.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAPP.L vs. SPDM.L — Risk / Return Rank
DAPP.L
SPDM.L
DAPP.L vs. SPDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAPP.L) and iShares Physical Palladium ETC (SPDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAPP.L | SPDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.86 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | 1.84 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAPP.L | SPDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.71 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | -0.33 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.10 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
DAPP.L vs. SPDM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAPP.L drawdown since its inception was -92.21%, which is greater than SPDM.L's maximum drawdown of -72.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP.L and SPDM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAPP.L | SPDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.21% | -72.00% | -20.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.39% | -37.47% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.14% | -39.90% | -18.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.21% | -72.00% | -20.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.98% | -56.54% | +22.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.08% | -27.59% | -31.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.87% | 17.51% | +7.36% |
Volatility
DAPP.L vs. SPDM.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAPP.L) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to iShares Physical Palladium ETC (SPDM.L) at 11.38%. This indicates that DAPP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAPP.L | SPDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.16% | 11.38% | +5.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.49% | 38.42% | +3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.79% | 45.52% | +13.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.09% | 43.28% | +33.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.87% | 38.71% | +38.16% |
DAPP.L vs. SPDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAPP.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDM.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAPP.L vs. SPDM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DAPP.L nor SPDM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DAPP.L and SPDM.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPDM.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPDM.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DAPP.L.
DAPP.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPDM.L is Commodities. DAPP.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SPDM.L tracks London Palladium PM Fix. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DAPP.L and 0.20% for SPDM.L.
Find the right allocation for DAPP.L and SPDM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer