DAMD vs. IWMY
DAMD (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAMD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., while IWMY is a Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.60, they often move in opposite directions. DAMD charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IWMY.
Performance
DAMD vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAMD achieves a -93.00% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 16.07% return.
DAMD
- 1D
- -4.95%
- 1M
- -22.42%
- YTD
- -93.00%
- 6M
- -92.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMY
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 6M
- 13.47%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DAMD vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DAMD Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF | -93.00% | 13.18% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 16.07% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAMD and IWMY is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | -0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAMD vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank
DAMD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWMY
DAMD vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF (DAMD) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAMD | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAMD vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAMD drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAMD and IWMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAMD | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -18.72% | -75.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.10% | 0.00% | -94.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.99% | -2.93% | -41.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility
DAMD vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAMD | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.09% | 16.37% | +122.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 139.09% | 15.93% | +123.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 139.09% | 15.93% | +123.16% |
DAMD vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAMD has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAMD vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison
DAMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DAMD Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 44.15% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAMD and IWMY have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for DAMD.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 44.15%, compared with 0.00% for DAMD.
DAMD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. DAMD tracks Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., while IWMY tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for DAMD and 0.99% for IWMY.
Find the right allocation for DAMD and IWMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer