DALI vs. CEFZ
DALI (First Trust Dorsey Wright DALI 1 ETF) and CEFZ (RiverNorth Active Income ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. DALI is passively managed, while CEFZ is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DALI charges 0.90%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for CEFZ.
Performance
DALI vs. CEFZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DALI achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than CEFZ's 5.16% return.
DALI
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.41%
- 10Y*
- —
CEFZ
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 5.16%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DALI vs. CEFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DALI First Trust Dorsey Wright DALI 1 ETF | 7.72% | 6.54% |
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | 5.16% | 7.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between DALI and CEFZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DALI vs. CEFZ — Risk / Return Rank
DALI
CEFZ
DALI vs. CEFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright DALI 1 ETF (DALI) and RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DALI | CEFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DALI | CEFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.56 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
DALI vs. CEFZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DALI drawdown since its inception was -36.06%, which is greater than CEFZ's maximum drawdown of -6.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DALI and CEFZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DALI | CEFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.06% | -6.66% | -29.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -0.73% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.14% | -1.20% | -8.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | — | — |
Volatility
DALI vs. CEFZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DALI | CEFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 10.39% | +6.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 10.39% | +9.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 10.39% | +10.53% |
DALI vs. CEFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DALI has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFZ's 3.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
DALI vs. CEFZ - Dividend Comparison
DALI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than CEFZ's 8.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | 8.27% | 4.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DALI First Trust Dorsey Wright DALI 1 ETF | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.18% | 3.42% | 0.50% | 0.11% | 1.25% | 0.45% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DALI and CEFZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DALI is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DALI is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for CEFZ.
CEFZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 0.38% for DALI.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for DALI and 3.36% for CEFZ.
Find the right allocation for DALI and CEFZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer