PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAK vs. DDTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAK vs. DDTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAK achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than DDTL's 4.28% return.


DAK

1D
-2.28%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.35%
6M
8.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DDTL

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.62%
YTD
4.28%
6M
5.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAK vs. DDTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DAK and DDTL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.77

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAK vs. DDTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DAK vs. DDTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAKDDTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

2.20

-0.48

Drawdowns

DAK vs. DDTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAK drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, which is greater than DDTL's maximum drawdown of -3.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAK and DDTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAKDDTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-3.78%

-4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-0.30%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-0.40%

-0.68%

Volatility

DAK vs. DDTL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAKDDTLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.39%

5.45%

+5.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.39%

5.45%

+5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

5.45%

+5.94%

DAK vs. DDTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAK has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than DDTL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAK vs. DDTL - Dividend Comparison

DAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while DDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


DAK and DDTL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DAK is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DAK is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.

DAK has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for DDTL.

DAK is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DDTL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Dakota Wealth and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DAK and 0.79% for DDTL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAK and DDTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer