PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
D6RQ.DE vs. XDEQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

D6RQ.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with D6RQ.DE having a 12.69% return and XDEQ.DE slightly lower at 12.57%.


D6RQ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.78%
6M
14.01%
YTD
12.69%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
21.30%
5Y*
15.26%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.23%

XDEQ.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
1.66%
6M
10.45%
YTD
12.57%
1Y
22.01%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
12.19%
ALL TIME*
9.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

D6RQ.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
D6RQ.DE
Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
12.69%4.36%42.08%34.15%-22.07%41.44%17.63%
XDEQ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
12.57%2.87%23.81%21.83%-14.80%34.39%12.11%

Correlation

The correlation between D6RQ.DE and XDEQ.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.87

The correlation between D6RQ.DE and XDEQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

D6RQ.DE vs. XDEQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

D6RQ.DE
D6RQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEQ.DE
XDEQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XDEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

D6RQ.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


D6RQ.DEXDEQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.52

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

14.82

-8.71

D6RQ.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the XDEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of D6RQ.DE and XDEQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

D6RQ.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum D6RQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.29%, smaller than the maximum XDEQ.DE drawdown of -32.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D6RQ.DE and XDEQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


D6RQ.DEXDEQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.29%

-32.18%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-6.22%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-20.59%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.29%

-20.59%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-1.07%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-6.53%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

1.48%

+2.82%

Volatility

D6RQ.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE) at 2.75%. This indicates that D6RQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


D6RQ.DEXDEQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

2.75%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

7.28%

+3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

10.55%

+4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

14.13%

+3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.56%

15.82%

+1.74%

D6RQ.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both D6RQ.DE and XDEQ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

D6RQ.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

D6RQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while XDEQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
D6RQ.DE
Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
0.38%0.53%0.39%0.60%0.80%0.46%0.25%
XDEQ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


D6RQ.DE and XDEQ.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

D6RQ.DE and XDEQ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

D6RQ.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XDEQ.DE is Global Equities. D6RQ.DE tracks MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select, while XDEQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Deka and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for D6RQ.DE and XDEQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer