D6RQ.DE vs. XD9U.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

D6RQ.DE (Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF) and XD9U.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - D6RQ.DE tracks the MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select while XD9U.DE tracks the MSCI USA. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, D6RQ.DE returned 17.54%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for XD9U.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. D6RQ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for XD9U.DE.

Performance

D6RQ.DE vs. XD9U.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XD9U.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, D6RQ.DE achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly higher than XD9U.DE's 11.32% return.

D6RQ.DE

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 7.43%
• YTD: 14.41%
• 6M: 13.29%
• 1Y: 33.08%
• 3Y*: 23.10%
• 5Y*: 17.54%
• 10Y*: —

XD9U.DE

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 4.48%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 10.63%
• 1Y: 25.16%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 14.38%
• 10Y*: 14.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

D6RQ.DE vs. XD9U.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
D6RQ.DE Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF	14.41%	4.36%	42.08%	34.15%	-22.07%	41.44%	12.56%
XD9U.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C	11.32%	4.60%	32.32%	23.38%	-15.69%	38.71%	11.80%

Correlation

The correlation between D6RQ.DE and XD9U.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020	0.96

The correlation between D6RQ.DE and XD9U.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

D6RQ.DE vs. XD9U.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

D6RQ.DE

D6RQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 61
D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
D6RQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
D6RQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
D6RQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
D6RQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 48

XD9U.DE

XD9U.DE Risk / Return Rank: 67
XD9U.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XD9U.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XD9U.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XD9U.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
XD9U.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

D6RQ.DE vs. XD9U.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XD9U.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	D6RQ.DE	XD9U.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.15	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	2.92	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.40	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	3.43	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.85	11.92	-4.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

D6RQ.DE vs. XD9U.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the XD9U.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of D6RQ.DE and XD9U.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	D6RQ.DE	XD9U.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	2.15	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	0.92	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.90	+0.18

Drawdowns

D6RQ.DE vs. XD9U.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum D6RQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.29%, smaller than the maximum XD9U.DE drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D6RQ.DE and XD9U.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	D6RQ.DE	XD9U.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.29%	-34.11%	+6.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	-7.30%	-4.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.29%	-23.68%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.29%	-23.68%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-0.38%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.82%	-4.37%	-1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	2.11%	+2.11%

Volatility

D6RQ.DE vs. XD9U.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XD9U.DE) at 2.71%. This indicates that D6RQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XD9U.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	D6RQ.DE	XD9U.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	2.71%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.35%	7.64%	+2.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.84%	11.68%	+3.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.79%	15.42%	+2.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.56%	16.23%	+1.33%

D6RQ.DE vs. XD9U.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

D6RQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XD9U.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

D6RQ.DE vs. XD9U.DE - Dividend Comparison

D6RQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while XD9U.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
D6RQ.DE Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF	0.37%	0.53%	0.39%	0.60%	0.80%	0.46%	0.25%
XD9U.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both D6RQ.DE and XD9U.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, D6RQ.DE and XD9U.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, D6RQ.DE or XD9U.DE?

On fees, XD9U.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, D6RQ.DE or XD9U.DE?

XD9U.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for D6RQ.DE.

What is the main difference between D6RQ.DE and XD9U.DE?

D6RQ.DE tracks MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select, while XD9U.DE tracks MSCI USA. They also come from different issuers: Deka and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for D6RQ.DE and 0.07% for XD9U.DE.