PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
D6RP.DE vs. CSY2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

D6RP.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RP.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, D6RP.DE achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than CSY2.DE's 11.44% return.


D6RP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.05%
6M
11.04%
YTD
10.71%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.23%

CSY2.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
0.44%
6M
10.76%
YTD
11.44%
1Y
22.74%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

D6RP.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
D6RP.DE
Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
10.71%6.56%34.46%27.65%-19.59%35.02%13.55%
CSY2.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD
11.44%6.30%30.42%25.14%-16.59%44.53%9.29%

Correlation

The correlation between D6RP.DE and CSY2.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.91

The correlation between D6RP.DE and CSY2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

D6RP.DE vs. CSY2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

D6RP.DE
D6RP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
D6RP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CSY2.DE
CSY2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

D6RP.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RP.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


D6RP.DECSY2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.48

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.06

8.68

-0.62

D6RP.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current D6RP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of D6RP.DE and CSY2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

D6RP.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum D6RP.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.89%, roughly equal to the maximum CSY2.DE drawdown of -24.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D6RP.DE and CSY2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


D6RP.DECSY2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.89%

-24.56%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-9.14%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

-24.56%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.89%

-24.56%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-1.17%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-4.72%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.61%

+0.18%

Volatility

D6RP.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RP.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) at 3.30%. This indicates that D6RP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


D6RP.DECSY2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

3.30%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

8.77%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

12.58%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

16.24%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

18.42%

-2.70%

D6RP.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

D6RP.DE has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CSY2.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

D6RP.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Dividend Comparison

D6RP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while CSY2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CSY2.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
D6RP.DE
Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
0.74%0.79%0.70%1.04%1.23%0.79%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, D6RP.DE and CSY2.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CSY2.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSY2.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for D6RP.DE.

D6RP.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while CSY2.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. D6RP.DE tracks MSCI World Climate Change ESG Select, while CSY2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. They also come from different issuers: Deka and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for D6RP.DE and 0.10% for CSY2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for D6RP.DE and CSY2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer