PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
D5BH.DE vs. XU61.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

D5BH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Canada Screened UCITS ETF (Acc) (D5BH.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, D5BH.DE achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly lower than XU61.DE's 12.78% return. Over the past 10 years, D5BH.DE has outperformed XU61.DE with an annualized return of 10.63%, while XU61.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.91% annualized return.


D5BH.DE

1D
-0.66%
1M
2.09%
6M
8.45%
YTD
10.59%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
10.63%
ALL TIME*
6.05%

XU61.DE

1D
0.35%
1M
1.01%
6M
11.68%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
6.91%
ALL TIME*
7.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

D5BH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
D5BH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Canada Screened UCITS ETF (Acc)
10.59%22.05%21.66%10.35%-7.54%35.28%-3.71%30.36%-13.85%1.16%
XU61.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR
12.78%17.07%10.27%10.09%-11.67%21.21%-9.09%31.08%-4.17%1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between D5BH.DE and XU61.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2010

0.65

The correlation between D5BH.DE and XU61.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

D5BH.DE vs. XU61.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

D5BH.DE
D5BH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
D5BH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D5BH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
D5BH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
D5BH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
D5BH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XU61.DE
XU61.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

D5BH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Canada Screened UCITS ETF (Acc) (D5BH.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


D5BH.DEXU61.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

4.18

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.77

15.36

+0.41

D5BH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current D5BH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of D5BH.DE and XU61.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

D5BH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum D5BH.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.61%, which is greater than XU61.DE's maximum drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D5BH.DE and XU61.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


D5BH.DEXU61.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.61%

-41.19%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.60%

-5.90%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.32%

-12.73%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.57%

-17.58%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.85%

-38.86%

-1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-1.66%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-8.84%

-8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.61%

+0.17%

Volatility

D5BH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Canada Screened UCITS ETF (Acc) (D5BH.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE) at 2.21%. This indicates that D5BH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XU61.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


D5BH.DEXU61.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

2.21%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

7.84%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

10.14%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

11.62%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

14.18%

+2.76%

D5BH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

D5BH.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XU61.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

D5BH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither D5BH.DE nor XU61.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


D5BH.DE and XU61.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XU61.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XU61.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for D5BH.DE.

D5BH.DE is categorized as Canada Equities, while XU61.DE is Global Equities. D5BH.DE tracks MSCI Canada Index, while XU61.DE tracks ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BNP Paribas Easy. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for D5BH.DE and 0.31% for XU61.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for D5BH.DE and XU61.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer