PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
D500.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

D500.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (D500.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with D500.DE having a 11.58% return and 4UBQ.DE slightly lower at 11.15%.


D500.DE

1D
-0.31%
1M
4.52%
YTD
11.58%
6M
11.08%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
15.48%
10Y*
15.85%

4UBQ.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
4.20%
YTD
11.15%
6M
11.13%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
15.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

D500.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
D500.DE
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist
11.58%4.86%32.62%22.70%-13.34%43.50%10.79%
4UBQ.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.15%5.39%31.02%24.03%-13.92%43.62%8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between D500.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020

0.98

The correlation between D500.DE and 4UBQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

D500.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

D500.DE
D500.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
D500.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D500.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
D500.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
D500.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
D500.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

4UBQ.DE
4UBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

D500.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (D500.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


D500.DE4UBQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

4.10

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.88

15.73

-2.85

D500.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current D500.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the 4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of D500.DE and 4UBQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


D500.DE4UBQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.47

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

1.00

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.11

-0.23

Drawdowns

D500.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum D500.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than 4UBQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D500.DE and 4UBQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


D500.DE4UBQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-23.35%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-6.93%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

-23.35%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.29%

-23.35%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-4.02%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.81%

+0.19%

Volatility

D500.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (D500.DE) is 2.66%, while UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that D500.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


D500.DE4UBQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.81%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.54%

7.61%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

11.53%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

15.27%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

15.39%

+0.69%

D500.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

D500.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

D500.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

D500.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while 4UBQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
4UBQ.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
D500.DE
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist
1.08%1.18%1.27%1.54%2.63%2.72%3.53%2.34%2.08%1.67%1.70%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, D500.DE and 4UBQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, D500.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

D500.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.

D500.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for D500.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for D500.DE and 4UBQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer