CYGB.L vs. SDIG.L
CYGB.L (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and SDIG.L (iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - CYGB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while SDIG.L is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CYGB.L returned 5.42%/yr vs 2.92%/yr for SDIG.L. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CYGB.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SDIG.L.
Performance
CYGB.L vs. SDIG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CYGB.L is traded in GBP, while SDIG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SDIG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CYGB.L achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than SDIG.L's 1.12% return.
CYGB.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.42%
- 10Y*
- —
SDIG.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 3.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
CYGB.L vs. SDIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 3.44% | 2.20% | 11.38% | 7.14% | 2.11% | 2.84% |
SDIG.L iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.12% | -1.44% | 6.77% | 0.54% | 6.49% | 4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CYGB.L and SDIG.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CYGB.L vs. SDIG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CYGB.L
SDIG.L
CYGB.L vs. SDIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L) and iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CYGB.L | SDIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.10 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | 0.70 | +4.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.15 | 1.94 | +10.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CYGB.L vs. SDIG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CYGB.L drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum SDIG.L drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYGB.L and SDIG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CYGB.L | SDIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -15.38% | +13.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.69% | -5.04% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.56% | -8.73% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.56% | -15.38% | +13.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -4.04% | +3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -5.71% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | 1.82% | -1.53% |
Volatility
CYGB.L vs. SDIG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L) is 0.59%, while iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDIG.L) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that CYGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CYGB.L | SDIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | 1.47% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 5.03% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72% | 6.47% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 8.07% | -5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.33% | 8.90% | -6.57% |
CYGB.L vs. SDIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CYGB.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SDIG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CYGB.L vs. SDIG.L - Dividend Comparison
CYGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than SDIG.L's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.70% | 1.84% | 2.13% | 2.38% | 2.68% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDIG.L iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.40% | 4.32% | 4.03% | 3.11% | 1.85% | 1.49% | 2.12% | 2.63% | 2.29% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CYGB.L and SDIG.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDIG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDIG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYGB.L.
CYGB.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SDIG.L is Short-Term Bond. CYGB.L tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while SDIG.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CYGB.L and 0.20% for SDIG.L.
Find the right allocation for CYGB.L and SDIG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer