CYBP.L vs. XLKQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CYBP.L (Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - CYBP.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while XLKQ.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CYBP.L returned 9.08%/yr vs 26.60%/yr for XLKQ.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CYBP.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.

Performance

CYBP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (CYBP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYBP.L achieves a 22.52% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.81% return.

CYBP.L

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 25.91%
• YTD: 22.52%
• 6M: 18.75%
• 1Y: 10.59%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 9.08%
• 10Y*: —

XLKQ.L

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: 14.41%
• YTD: 23.81%
• 6M: 22.31%
• 1Y: 54.52%
• 3Y*: 33.18%
• 5Y*: 26.60%
• 10Y*: 27.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYBP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CYBP.L Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF	22.52%	-5.63%	11.55%	39.00%	-25.32%	6.31%	50.80%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	23.81%	15.76%	44.03%	51.84%	-20.58%	36.28%	36.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CYBP.L and XLKQ.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020	0.62

The correlation between CYBP.L and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CYBP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CYBP.L	XLKQ.L
Technology	98.0%	91.2%
Communication Services	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	7.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CYBP.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYBP.L

CYBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
CYBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
CYBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
CYBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CYBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
CYBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYBP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (CYBP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CYBP.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	2.83	-2.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	3.59	-2.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.46	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	3.24	-2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.82	8.42	-7.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CYBP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYBP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYBP.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CYBP.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39	2.83	-2.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	1.21	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	1.33	-0.81

Drawdowns

CYBP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYBP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.20%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -28.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBP.L and XLKQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CYBP.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.20%	-28.74%	-5.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.52%	-16.76%	-12.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.20%	-28.74%	-5.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.20%	-28.74%	-5.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.72%	-2.84%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.80%	-5.04%	-7.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.87%	6.45%	+6.42%

Volatility

CYBP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Rize Cybersecurity and Data Privacy UCITS ETF (CYBP.L) has a higher volatility of 11.25% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) at 6.83%. This indicates that CYBP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CYBP.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.25%	6.83%	+4.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.01%	14.29%	+9.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.80%	19.18%	+7.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.74%	22.04%	+2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.50%	21.65%	+3.85%

CYBP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CYBP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

CYBP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CYBP.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CYBP.L and XLKQ.L in my portfolio?

CYBP.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CYBP.L or XLKQ.L?

On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CYBP.L or XLKQ.L?

XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CYBP.L.

What is the main difference between CYBP.L and XLKQ.L?

CYBP.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Davy and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CYBP.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.