CXHYX vs. NMZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) and Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ).
CXHYX is managed by Delaware Funds. It was launched on Sep 21, 1986. NMZ is an actively managed fund by Nuveen. It was launched on Nov 19, 2003.
Performance
CXHYX vs. NMZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CXHYX vs. NMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXHYX Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.46% | 1.71% | 5.76% | 8.26% | -14.85% | 7.86% | 6.49% | 11.52% | 1.58% | 10.15% |
NMZ Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund | 3.39% | 1.56% | 16.52% | 0.69% | -27.36% | 10.41% | 7.33% | 28.36% | -9.47% | 12.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXHYX achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than NMZ's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CXHYX has outperformed NMZ with an annualized return of 3.39%, while NMZ has yielded a comparatively lower 2.88% annualized return.
CXHYX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 0.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
NMZ
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- -0.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CXHYX vs. NMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXHYX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than NMZ's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CXHYX vs. NMZ — Risk / Return Rank
CXHYX
NMZ
CXHYX vs. NMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) and Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXHYX | NMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.07 | 0.18 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.14 | 0.32 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.05 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 0.20 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 0.60 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXHYX | NMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | 0.18 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | -0.04 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.20 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.27 | +0.90 |
Correlation
The correlation between CXHYX and NMZ is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CXHYX vs. NMZ - Dividend Comparison
CXHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than NMZ's 7.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXHYX Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 4.96% | 6.41% | 5.43% | 3.99% | 4.94% | 3.61% | 4.42% | 5.27% | 4.92% | 4.98% | 3.87% | 3.77% |
NMZ Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund | 7.60% | 7.71% | 6.35% | 5.44% | 7.04% | 5.10% | 5.09% | 4.99% | 6.15% | 5.94% | 6.94% | 6.67% |
Drawdowns
CXHYX vs. NMZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXHYX drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum NMZ drawdown of -58.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXHYX and NMZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXHYX | NMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -58.53% | +36.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -11.04% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | -40.03% | +19.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.11% | -40.03% | +19.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -12.20% | +9.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -9.45% | +6.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 3.69% | -0.75% |
Volatility
CXHYX vs. NMZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) is 1.55%, while Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that CXHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CXHYX | NMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 4.98% | -3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.43% | 6.50% | -4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.26% | 12.70% | -5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 12.90% | -6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 14.71% | -8.93% |