PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXHYX vs. NMZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXHYX vs. NMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) and Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXHYX achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than NMZ's 3.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CXHYX has outperformed NMZ with an annualized return of 3.47%, while NMZ has yielded a comparatively lower 2.67% annualized return.


CXHYX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.88%
YTD
2.50%
6M
2.33%
1Y
5.89%
3Y*
4.87%
5Y*
0.92%
10Y*
3.47%

NMZ

1D
0.39%
1M
1.03%
YTD
3.70%
6M
0.41%
1Y
7.19%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
-1.46%
10Y*
2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXHYX vs. NMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CXHYX
Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund
2.50%1.71%5.76%8.26%-14.85%7.86%6.49%11.52%1.58%10.15%
NMZ
Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund
3.70%1.56%16.52%0.69%-27.36%10.41%7.33%28.36%-9.47%12.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CXHYX and NMZ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2003

0.25

The correlation between CXHYX and NMZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXHYX vs. NMZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXHYX
CXHYX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CXHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CXHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

NMZ
NMZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
NMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXHYX vs. NMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) and Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXHYXNMZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.15

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.22

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

3.06

+2.38

CXHYX vs. NMZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXHYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the NMZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXHYX and NMZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CXHYXNMZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

0.77

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

-0.11

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.18

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.27

+0.92

Drawdowns

CXHYX vs. NMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXHYX drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum NMZ drawdown of -58.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXHYX and NMZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXHYXNMZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-58.53%

+36.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-5.94%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.55%

-21.56%

+12.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-40.03%

+19.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.11%

-40.03%

+19.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-11.94%

+11.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-9.47%

+6.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

2.35%

-1.20%

Volatility

CXHYX vs. NMZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) is 1.35%, while Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that CXHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXHYXNMZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

2.47%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

7.29%

-4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

9.38%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

12.93%

-6.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.80%

14.76%

-8.96%

CXHYX vs. NMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXHYX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than NMZ's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXHYX vs. NMZ - Dividend Comparison

CXHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than NMZ's 7.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CXHYX
Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund
4.96%6.41%5.43%3.99%4.94%3.61%4.42%5.27%4.92%4.98%3.87%3.77%
NMZ
Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund
7.68%7.71%6.35%5.44%7.04%5.10%5.09%4.99%6.15%5.94%6.94%6.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXHYX and NMZ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMZ has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to CXHYX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXHYX dropped -21.82% vs NMZ's -58.53%.

CXHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXHYX and NMZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer