PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXF.TO vs. CIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Canadian Convertible Bond ETF (CXF.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXF.TO achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than CIC.TO's 26.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CXF.TO has underperformed CIC.TO with an annualized return of 6.01%, while CIC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.93% annualized return.


CXF.TO

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.95%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.43%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
6.01%

CIC.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
9.33%
YTD
26.10%
6M
25.61%
1Y
57.81%
3Y*
29.54%
5Y*
16.38%
10Y*
13.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CXF.TO
CI Canadian Convertible Bond ETF
1.52%9.05%19.64%1.36%-3.47%6.85%6.83%15.04%-4.63%4.23%
CIC.TO
CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF
26.10%35.32%21.30%6.58%-10.99%33.76%1.89%14.12%-8.88%12.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CXF.TO and CIC.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2011

0.08

The correlation between CXF.TO and CIC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.08 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXF.TO vs. CIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXF.TO
CXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CIC.TO
CIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canadian Convertible Bond ETF (CXF.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CXF.TOCIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.97

-0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

7.06

-4.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.22

33.08

-27.87

CXF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the CIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXF.TO and CIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CXF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, smaller than the maximum CIC.TO drawdown of -38.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXF.TO and CIC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXF.TOCIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.03%

-38.55%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.79%

-8.23%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.81%

-14.32%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.87%

-26.34%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.03%

-38.55%

+7.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-5.47%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.75%

+0.07%

Volatility

CXF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Canadian Convertible Bond ETF (CXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO) at 2.60%. This indicates that CXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXF.TOCIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

2.60%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

9.90%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

11.44%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.03%

12.80%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.30%

16.26%

-1.96%

Dividends

CXF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than CIC.TO's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIC.TO
CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF
4.94%5.17%6.71%7.37%7.64%5.48%9.56%6.16%6.61%5.68%6.72%7.31%
CXF.TO
CI Canadian Convertible Bond ETF
4.52%4.48%4.75%5.31%5.11%4.70%4.79%4.86%5.32%4.82%4.79%5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXF.TO and CIC.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXF.TO is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while CIC.TO is Financials Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXF.TO and CIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer