PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXAI vs. KITT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CXAI vs. KITT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CXApp Inc. (CXAI) and Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXAI achieves a -33.40% return, which is significantly higher than KITT's -79.32% return.


CXAI

1D
-6.07%
1M
21.82%
YTD
-33.40%
6M
-36.90%
1Y
-75.38%
3Y*
-72.47%
5Y*
-53.24%
10Y*

KITT

1D
-0.78%
1M
-24.85%
YTD
-79.32%
6M
-82.71%
1Y
-98.08%
3Y*
-94.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXAI vs. KITT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CXAI
CXApp Inc.
-33.40%-81.76%41.09%-87.19%0.80%1.32%
KITT
Nauticus Robotics Inc.
-79.32%-94.50%-93.65%-81.88%-62.45%1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CXAI and KITT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CXAI:

$10.00M

KITT:

$8.49M

EPS

CXAI:

-$0.58

KITT:

-$8.89

PS Ratio

CXAI:

1.90

KITT:

1.11

PB Ratio

CXAI:

0.63

KITT:

1.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

CXAI:

$3.20M

KITT:

$5.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CXAI:

$1.92M

KITT:

-$7.06M

EBITDA (TTM)

CXAI:

-$11.81M

KITT:

-$20.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CXApp Inc.

Nauticus Robotics Inc.

Return for Risk

CXAI vs. KITT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXAI
CXAI Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CXAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXAI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CXAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXAI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

KITT
KITT Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
KITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
KITT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
KITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
KITT Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXAI vs. KITT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CXApp Inc. (CXAI) and Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CXAIKITTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.71

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

-1.00

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

-1.22

+0.02

CXAI vs. KITT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXAI Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is comparable to the KITT Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXAI and KITT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CXAI vs. KITT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXAI drawdown since its inception was -99.01%, roughly equal to the maximum KITT drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXAI and KITT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXAIKITTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.01%

-100.00%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.79%

-98.47%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.75%

-99.98%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.40%

-100.00%

+1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.45%

-70.26%

+17.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.33%

79.95%

-17.62%

Volatility

CXAI vs. KITT - Volatility Comparison

CXApp Inc. (CXAI) has a higher volatility of 72.45% compared to Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT) at 23.81%. This indicates that CXAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KITT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXAIKITTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

72.45%

23.81%

+48.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

102.55%

92.62%

+9.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

125.84%

175.31%

-49.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

221.16%

152.17%

+68.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

213.07%

152.17%

+60.90%

Dividends

CXAI vs. KITT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXAI nor KITT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CXAI vs. KITT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CXApp Inc. and Nauticus Robotics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00M2.00M3.00M4.00M5.00M20222023202420252026
950.00K
1.06M
(CXAI) Total Revenue
(KITT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CXAI and KITT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXAI has higher volatility (72.45%) compared to KITT (23.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXAI dropped -99.01% vs KITT's -100.00%.

KITT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXAI and KITT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer