CXAI vs. KITT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CXApp Inc. (CXAI) and Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT).

Performance

CXAI vs. KITT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CXApp Inc. (CXAI) and Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CXAI vs. KITT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CXAI CXApp Inc.	-45.63%	-81.76%	41.09%	-87.19%	0.80%	1.22%
KITT Nauticus Robotics Inc.	-35.02%	-94.50%	-93.65%	-81.88%	-62.45%	2.05%

Fundamentals

EPS CXAI : -$0.57 KITT : -$39.50
PS Ratio CXAI : 0.91 KITT : 0.38
Total Revenue (TTM) CXAI : $4.11M KITT : $4.69M
Gross Profit (TTM) CXAI : $3.43M KITT : -$6.01M
EBITDA (TTM) CXAI : -$7.91M KITT : -$141.95M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXAI achieves a -45.63% return, which is significantly lower than KITT's -35.02% return.

CXAI

• 1D: -9.75%
• 1M: -1.47%
• YTD: -45.63%
• 6M: -75.51%
• 1Y: -79.94%
• 3Y*: -53.63%
• 5Y*: -55.09%
• 10Y*: —

KITT

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: -33.30%
• YTD: -35.02%
• 6M: -82.68%
• 1Y: -93.97%
• 3Y*: -91.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CXAI vs. KITT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXAI

CXAI Risk / Return Rank: 11
CXAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CXAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CXAI Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CXAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
CXAI Martin Ratio Rank: 12

KITT

KITT Risk / Return Rank: 8
KITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
KITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KITT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
KITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
KITT Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXAI vs. KITT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CXApp Inc. (CXAI) and Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CXAI	KITT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	-0.53	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.21	-1.61	+0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	0.82	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	-0.99	+0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.39	-1.44	+0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CXAI vs. KITT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXAI Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is comparable to the KITT Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXAI and KITT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CXAI	KITT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	-0.53	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	-0.55	+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between CXAI and KITT is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CXAI vs. KITT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXAI nor KITT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CXAI vs. KITT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXAI drawdown since its inception was -98.80%, roughly equal to the maximum KITT drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXAI and KITT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXAI	KITT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.80%	-99.99%	+1.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-88.33%	-95.31%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.70%	-99.99%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.46%	-68.87%	+18.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.19%	65.61%	-9.42%

Volatility

CXAI vs. KITT - Volatility Comparison

CXApp Inc. (CXAI) and Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT) have volatilities of 46.63% and 49.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXAI	KITT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	46.63%	49.01%	-2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	80.77%	133.13%	-52.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	126.66%	176.11%	-49.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	217.44%	154.42%	+63.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	214.22%	154.42%	+59.80%

Financials