CXAI vs. KITT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CXAI (CXApp Inc.) and KITT (Nauticus Robotics Inc.) are both stocks. CXAI operates in Software - Application (Technology), while KITT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, CXAI returned -74.63%/yr vs -94.48%/yr for KITT. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CXAI vs. KITT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CXApp Inc. (CXAI) and Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXAI achieves a -63.07% return, which is significantly higher than KITT's -85.79% return.

CXAI

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -26.54%
• 6M: -62.44%
• YTD: -63.07%
• 1Y: -86.60%
• 3Y*: -74.63%
• 5Y*: -58.43%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -55.39%

KITT

• 1D: 5.27%
• 1M: -22.76%
• 6M: -89.61%
• YTD: -85.79%
• 1Y: -98.68%
• 3Y*: -94.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -87.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CXAI CXApp Inc.	$470.12K	$572.56K	$4.97M
KITT Nauticus Robotics Inc.	$136.94K	$216.68K	$448.95K

CXAI vs. KITT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CXAI CXApp Inc.	-63.07%	-81.76%	41.09%	-87.19%	0.80%	1.32%
KITT Nauticus Robotics Inc.	-85.79%	-94.50%	-93.65%	-81.88%	-62.45%	1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CXAI and KITT is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021	0.15

The correlation between CXAI and KITT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CXAI : $2.87M KITT : $622.27K
EPS CXAI : -$0.53 KITT : -$7.73
PS Ratio CXAI : 1.14 KITT : 0.87
PB Ratio CXAI : 0.35 KITT : 0.83
Total Revenue (TTM) CXAI : $3.20M KITT : $5.27M
Gross Profit (TTM) CXAI : $1.92M KITT : -$7.06M
EBITDA (TTM) CXAI : -$11.81M KITT : -$20.22M

Return for Risk

CXAI vs. KITT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CXAI

CXAI Risk / Return Rank: 8
CXAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CXAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CXAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CXAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CXAI Martin Ratio Rank: 9

KITT

KITT Risk / Return Rank: 8
KITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
KITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
KITT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
KITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
KITT Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CXAI vs. KITT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CXApp Inc. (CXAI) and Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CXAI	KITT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	-0.56	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.60	-3.03	+1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.68	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	-1.00	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	-1.17	-0.19

CXAI vs. KITT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXAI Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is comparable to the KITT Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXAI and KITT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CXAI vs. KITT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXAI drawdown since its inception was -99.21%, roughly equal to the maximum KITT drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXAI and KITT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXAI	KITT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.21%	-100.00%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-88.42%	-98.91%	+10.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.57%	-99.99%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.21%	-100.00%	+0.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.11%	-100.00%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.37%	-70.90%	+17.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	63.99%	84.39%	-20.40%

Volatility

CXAI vs. KITT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CXApp Inc. (CXAI) is 23.32%, while Nauticus Robotics Inc. (KITT) has a volatility of 27.70%. This indicates that CXAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KITT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXAI	KITT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.32%	27.70%	-4.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	103.49%	79.08%	+24.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	127.40%	175.10%	-47.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	221.53%	151.16%	+70.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	211.42%	151.16%	+60.26%

Dividends

CXAI vs. KITT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXAI nor KITT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CXAI and KITT in my portfolio?

CXAI and KITT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CXAI or KITT?

KITT has higher volatility (27.70%) compared to CXAI (23.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXAI dropped -99.21% vs KITT's -100.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KITT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.