CWST vs. ZROZ
CWST (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.) is a stock, while ZROZ (PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Long U.S. Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. Over the past 10 years, CWST returned 26.34%/yr vs -5.08%/yr for ZROZ. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CWST vs. ZROZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWST achieves a -4.46% return, which is significantly lower than ZROZ's -3.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CWST has outperformed ZROZ with an annualized return of 26.34%, while ZROZ has yielded a comparatively lower -5.08% annualized return.
CWST
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 7.58%
- 6M
- -11.85%
- YTD
- -4.46%
- 1Y
- -13.31%
- 3Y*
- 2.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 26.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.05%
ZROZ
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- 6M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -3.79%
- 1Y
- 1.09%
- 3Y*
- -8.49%
- 5Y*
- -13.64%
- 10Y*
- -5.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.92%
CWST vs. ZROZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | -4.46% | -7.44% | 23.81% | 7.75% | -7.15% | 37.89% | 34.59% | 61.57% | 23.76% | 85.50% |
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | -3.79% | -1.84% | -16.18% | 1.19% | -41.28% | -5.22% | 24.57% | 21.22% | -5.43% | 14.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWST and ZROZ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009 | -0.09 |
The correlation between CWST and ZROZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWST vs. ZROZ — Risk / Return Rank
CWST
ZROZ
CWST vs. ZROZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWST | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.02 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 0.08 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 0.16 | -0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWST vs. ZROZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWST drawdown since its inception was -98.52%, which is greater than ZROZ's maximum drawdown of -62.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWST and ZROZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWST | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.52% | -62.93% | -35.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.56% | -14.02% | -18.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.72% | -27.10% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -57.98% | +20.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | -62.93% | +25.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.26% | -61.03% | +38.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.91% | -24.30% | -28.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.80% | 6.77% | +11.03% |
Volatility
CWST vs. ZROZ - Volatility Comparison
Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) has a higher volatility of 11.67% compared to PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) at 4.10%. This indicates that CWST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZROZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWST | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.67% | 4.10% | +7.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.86% | 11.00% | +17.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.12% | 15.56% | +19.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 23.75% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.00% | 21.95% | +9.05% |
Dividends
CWST vs. ZROZ - Dividend Comparison
CWST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZROZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | 5.39% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.76% | 1.60% | 1.68% | 2.22% | 2.06% | 2.53% | 3.00% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWST and ZROZ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWST has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to ZROZ (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWST dropped -98.52% vs ZROZ's -62.93%.
ZROZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWST and ZROZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer