PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWO.NEO vs. SCHE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CWO.NEO vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF (CWO.NEO) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CWO.NEO vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWO.NEO
iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF
4.72%26.34%22.33%9.56%-9.03%7.13%-3.12%10.86%-0.29%17.16%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.16%20.74%20.10%6.53%-11.98%-1.55%12.55%14.40%-6.24%24.25%
Different Trading Currencies

CWO.NEO is traded in CAD, while SCHE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWO.NEO achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly higher than SCHE's 2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CWO.NEO has outperformed SCHE with an annualized return of 10.26%, while SCHE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.42% annualized return.


CWO.NEO

1D
-0.68%
1M
-3.79%
YTD
4.72%
6M
6.75%
1Y
24.14%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
10.26%

SCHE

1D
0.13%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
2.16%
6M
0.84%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
8.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CWO.NEO vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWO.NEO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CWO.NEO vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWO.NEO
CWO.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CWO.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWO.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWO.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CWO.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWO.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWO.NEO vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF (CWO.NEO) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWO.NEOSCHEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

1.11

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.59

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.56

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.53

5.53

+1.00

CWO.NEO vs. SCHE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWO.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the SCHE Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWO.NEO and SCHE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWO.NEOSCHEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.11

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.39

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.50

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.38

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between CWO.NEO and SCHE is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CWO.NEO vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison

CWO.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than SCHE's 2.85% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWO.NEO
iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF
2.66%2.79%3.50%4.14%5.03%4.61%2.64%3.01%3.22%2.60%2.57%3.23%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.85%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%

Drawdowns

CWO.NEO vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWO.NEO drawdown since its inception was -31.99%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHE drawdown of -30.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWO.NEO and SCHE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CWO.NEOSCHEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.99%

-36.20%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-12.14%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.80%

-33.77%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

-36.20%

+4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.63%

-8.15%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-12.71%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.23%

+0.35%

Volatility

CWO.NEO vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF (CWO.NEO) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) have volatilities of 7.45% and 7.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CWO.NEOSCHEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.45%

7.54%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

12.32%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.33%

17.28%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

15.18%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

16.88%

+0.66%