PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWII vs. SCLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWII vs. SCLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWII achieves a 37.23% return, which is significantly higher than SCLZ's 6.46% return.


CWII

1D
-5.26%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
37.23%
6M
17.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCLZ

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.97%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.49%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWII vs. SCLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CWII
REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF
37.23%-42.16%
SCLZ
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.46%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CWII and SCLZ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWII vs. SCLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWII

SCLZ
SCLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SCLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SCLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWII vs. SCLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CWII vs. SCLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWIISCLZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

1.17

-1.54

Drawdowns

CWII vs. SCLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, which is greater than SCLZ's maximum drawdown of -12.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and SCLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIISCLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.46%

-12.58%

-35.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.63%

-0.23%

-20.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.55%

-1.37%

-29.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

Volatility

CWII vs. SCLZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIISCLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.61%

9.13%

+79.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.61%

11.35%

+77.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.61%

11.35%

+77.26%

CWII vs. SCLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SCLZ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWII vs. SCLZ - Dividend Comparison

CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than SCLZ's 9.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CWII
REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF
20.73%6.09%0.00%
SCLZ
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
9.15%7.53%4.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWII and SCLZ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCLZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCLZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 9.15% for SCLZ.

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Swan. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.79% for SCLZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWII and SCLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer