CWII vs. PEPS
CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWII charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
CWII vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWII achieves a 37.23% return, which is significantly higher than PEPS's 10.67% return.
CWII
- 1D
- -5.26%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- 37.23%
- 6M
- 17.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEPS
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 31.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWII vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 37.23% | -42.16% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 10.67% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWII and PEPS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWII vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
CWII
PEPS
CWII vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWII | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 1.05 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
CWII vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, which is greater than PEPS's maximum drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWII | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.46% | -21.26% | -27.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.63% | -0.51% | -20.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.55% | -2.77% | -27.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
CWII vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWII | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.61% | 13.06% | +75.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.61% | 18.31% | +70.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.61% | 18.31% | +70.30% |
CWII vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWII vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 20.73% | 6.09% | 0.00% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.88% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWII and PEPS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.
CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.10% for PEPS.
Find the right allocation for CWII and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer