CWII vs. OMAH
CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWII charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
CWII vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWII achieves a 37.23% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.
CWII
- 1D
- -5.26%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- 37.23%
- 6M
- 17.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 11.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWII vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 37.23% | -42.16% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 4.56% | 1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWII and OMAH is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWII vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
CWII
OMAH
CWII vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWII | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 0.70 | -1.08 |
Drawdowns
CWII vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWII | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.46% | -11.83% | -36.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.63% | -2.65% | -17.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.55% | -1.26% | -29.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility
CWII vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWII | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.61% | 8.05% | +80.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.61% | 13.21% | +75.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.61% | 13.21% | +75.40% |
CWII vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWII vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than OMAH's 15.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 20.73% | 6.09% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.44% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWII and OMAH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.
CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 15.44% for OMAH.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for CWII and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer