CWII vs. NFLU
CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) and NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX Shares, while NFLU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX Shares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. CWII charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NFLU.
Performance
CWII vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWII achieves a 13,199.78% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -46.72% return.
CWII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10,273.16%
- YTD
- 13,199.78%
- 6M
- 11,946.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLU
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -33.62%
- YTD
- -46.72%
- 6M
- -46.68%
- 1Y
- -73.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWII vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 13,199.78% | -45.06% |
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF | -46.72% | -30.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWII and NFLU is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWII vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank
CWII
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFLU
CWII vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWII | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.74 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWII vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, smaller than the maximum NFLU drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and NFLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWII | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.04% | -76.74% | +25.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -76.74% | +76.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.26% | -29.18% | -4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 49.08% | — |
Volatility
CWII vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWII | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13,701.30% | 67.87% | +13,633.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13,701.30% | 69.06% | +13,632.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13,701.30% | 69.06% | +13,632.24% |
CWII vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWII vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison
CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 123.26%, while NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 123.26% | 6.09% |
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWII and NFLU have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CWII is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CWII is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.
CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.
CWII is categorized as Derivative Income, while NFLU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 1.05% for NFLU.
Find the right allocation for CWII and NFLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer