CWII vs. GPIX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWII charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.

Performance

CWII vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWII achieves a 13,199.78% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 10.85% return.

CWII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10,779.80%
• 6M: 10,682.10%
• YTD: 13,199.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: 9.60%
• YTD: 10.85%
• 1Y: 21.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWII vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	13,199.78%	-45.06%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	10.85%	0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CWII and GPIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

CWII vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 79
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWII vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CWII	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.01	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.78	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.60	—

Drawdowns

CWII vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWII	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.04%	-17.50%	-33.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.02%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.26%	-1.47%	-31.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.61%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CWII	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13,701.30%	10.88%	+13,690.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13,701.30%	13.78%	+13,687.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13,701.30%	13.78%	+13,687.52%

CWII vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

CWII vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

CWII has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	123.26%	6.09%	0.00%	0.00%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	8.06%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWII and GPIX in my portfolio?

CWII and GPIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CWII or GPIX?

On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CWII or GPIX?

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CWII or GPIX?

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 8.06% for GPIX.

What is the main difference between CWII and GPIX?

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.29% for GPIX.