CWII vs. DIVO
CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWII charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
CWII vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWII achieves a 13,199.78% return, which is significantly higher than DIVO's 6.99% return.
CWII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10,779.80%
- 6M
- 10,682.10%
- YTD
- 13,199.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVO
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
CWII vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 13,199.78% | -45.06% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.99% | 2.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWII and DIVO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWII vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
CWII
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIVO
CWII vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWII | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWII vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWII | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.04% | -30.04% | -21.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.21% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.26% | -2.59% | -30.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility
CWII vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWII | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13,701.30% | 9.19% | +13,692.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13,701.30% | 11.93% | +13,689.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13,701.30% | 14.79% | +13,686.51% |
CWII vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWII vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
CWII has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 123.26% | 6.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.39% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWII and DIVO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.
CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 6.39% for DIVO.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.56% for DIVO.
Find the right allocation for CWII and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer