CWEU.L vs. IESU.L
CWEU.L (Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD) and IESU.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds - CWEU.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while IESU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CWEU.L returned 7.08%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for IESU.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CWEU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IESU.L.
Performance
CWEU.L vs. IESU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CWEU.L is traded in USD, while IESU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IESU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEU.L achieves a 37.46% return, which is significantly higher than IESU.L's 28.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CWEU.L has underperformed IESU.L with an annualized return of 7.08%, while IESU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.78% annualized return.
CWEU.L
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 32.86%
- YTD
- 37.46%
- 1Y
- 50.58%
- 3Y*
- 11.64%
- 5Y*
- 17.64%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
IESU.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- YTD
- 28.54%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.63%
- 5Y*
- 22.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
CWEU.L vs. IESU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEU.L Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD | 37.46% | 24.68% | -20.89% | 1.94% | 45.91% | 37.36% | -31.10% | 10.32% | -16.71% | 4.70% |
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.54% | 9.98% | 3.69% | -1.00% | 63.91% | 52.43% | -33.64% | 9.60% | -18.29% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEU.L and IESU.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CWEU.L and IESU.L has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEU.L vs. IESU.L — Risk / Return Rank
CWEU.L
IESU.L
CWEU.L vs. IESU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD (CWEU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEU.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.26 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.98 | 2.21 | +3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.46 | 5.65 | +13.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEU.L vs. IESU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEU.L drawdown since its inception was -69.57%, roughly equal to the maximum IESU.L drawdown of -72.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEU.L and IESU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEU.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.57% | -72.57% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -16.37% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.40% | -22.55% | -9.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.42% | -27.74% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.38% | -66.85% | +2.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.87% | +8.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.80% | -24.88% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 6.42% | -3.86% |
Volatility
CWEU.L vs. IESU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD (CWEU.L) is 4.37%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that CWEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEU.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 6.97% | -2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.73% | 21.03% | -7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.14% | 23.89% | -6.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.01% | 29.47% | -6.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 29.81% | -4.39% |
CWEU.L vs. IESU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IESU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CWEU.L vs. IESU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CWEU.L nor IESU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEU.L and IESU.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IESU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IESU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CWEU.L.
CWEU.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CWEU.L and 0.15% for IESU.L.
Find the right allocation for CWEU.L and IESU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer