PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CW8U.L vs. MEUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CW8U.L vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CW8U.L is traded in USD, while MEUD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MEUD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CW8U.L achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than MEUD.L's 6.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CW8U.L has outperformed MEUD.L with an annualized return of 12.85%, while MEUD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.48% annualized return.


CW8U.L

1D
0.08%
1M
4.18%
YTD
9.80%
6M
10.88%
1Y
25.61%
3Y*
20.52%
5Y*
11.60%
10Y*
12.85%

MEUD.L

1D
0.63%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6.32%
6M
9.73%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CW8U.L vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CW8U.L
Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD
9.80%20.32%19.03%24.06%-18.23%22.09%15.78%28.00%-9.95%22.67%
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
6.32%36.05%1.93%19.47%-15.19%16.00%7.03%25.23%-14.71%26.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CW8U.L and MEUD.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2013

0.81

The correlation between CW8U.L and MEUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

CW8U.L vs. MEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CW8U.L
MEUD.L

Technology

28.3%
9.4%

Financial Services

15.7%
24.0%

Industrials

11.4%
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
6.9%

Communication Services

9.3%
3.1%

Healthcare

8.8%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
7.7%

Energy

4.2%
5.5%

Basic Materials

3.3%
5.0%

Utilities

2.7%
4.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.2%

Technology

CW8U.L
28.3%
MEUD.L
9.4%

Financial Services

CW8U.L
15.7%
MEUD.L
24.0%

Industrials

CW8U.L
11.4%
MEUD.L
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CW8U.L
9.3%
MEUD.L
6.9%

Communication Services

CW8U.L
9.3%
MEUD.L
3.1%

Healthcare

CW8U.L
8.8%
MEUD.L
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

CW8U.L
5.2%
MEUD.L
7.7%

Energy

CW8U.L
4.2%
MEUD.L
5.5%

Basic Materials

CW8U.L
3.3%
MEUD.L
5.0%

Utilities

CW8U.L
2.7%
MEUD.L
4.5%

Real Estate

CW8U.L
1.9%
MEUD.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CW8U.L vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CW8U.L
CW8U.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CW8U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MEUD.L
MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CW8U.L vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CW8U.LMEUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.23

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

1.59

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.87

5.66

+7.22

CW8U.L vs. MEUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CW8U.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CW8U.L and MEUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CW8U.LMEUD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.26

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.50

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.53

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.43

+0.31

Drawdowns

CW8U.L vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CW8U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, smaller than the maximum MEUD.L drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW8U.L and MEUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CW8U.LMEUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.10%

-36.06%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-11.53%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-14.53%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.79%

-32.40%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

-36.06%

+1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-1.75%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-7.67%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

3.24%

-1.26%

Volatility

CW8U.L vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L) is 3.27%, while Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that CW8U.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CW8U.LMEUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

4.95%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

11.96%

-2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

14.53%

-2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

17.51%

-1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

17.71%

-1.87%

CW8U.L vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CW8U.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

CW8U.L vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CW8U.L nor MEUD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CW8U.L and MEUD.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CW8U.L.

CW8U.L is categorized as Global Equities, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. CW8U.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CW8U.L and 0.15% for MEUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CW8U.L and MEUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer