PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CW8G.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CW8G.L vs. INFR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CW8G.L (Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - CW8G.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CW8G.L returned 13.68%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for INFR.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CW8G.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.

Performance

CW8G.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CW8G.L having a 9.97% return and INFR.L slightly lower at 9.52%. Over the past 10 years, CW8G.L has outperformed INFR.L with an annualized return of 13.68%, while INFR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.66% annualized return.

CW8G.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.16%
YTD
9.97%
6M
10.16%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
13.68%

INFR.L

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
9.52%
6M
8.44%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
8.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CW8G.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CW8G.L
Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD		9.97%12.11%20.95%17.29%-8.45%23.58%11.88%23.12%-4.09%11.70%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		9.52%5.90%11.49%-4.96%5.77%19.54%-4.70%20.82%4.39%5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CW8G.L and INFR.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between CW8G.L and INFR.L has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CW8G.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CW8G.L
INFR.L

Technology

28.3%
0.7%

Financial Services

15.7%
0.0%

Industrials

11.4%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Communication Services

9.3%
1.0%

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.2%

-

Energy

4.2%
16.4%

Basic Materials

3.3%

-

Utilities

2.7%
56.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
5.0%

Technology

CW8G.L
28.3%
INFR.L
0.7%

Financial Services

CW8G.L
15.7%
INFR.L
0.0%

Industrials

CW8G.L
11.4%
INFR.L
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CW8G.L
9.3%
INFR.L

-

Communication Services

CW8G.L
9.3%
INFR.L
1.0%

Healthcare

CW8G.L
8.8%
INFR.L

-

Consumer Defensive

CW8G.L
5.2%
INFR.L

-

Energy

CW8G.L
4.2%
INFR.L
16.4%

Basic Materials

CW8G.L
3.3%
INFR.L

-

Utilities

CW8G.L
2.7%
INFR.L
56.0%

Real Estate

CW8G.L
1.9%
INFR.L
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD

iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with CW8G.L:
CW8G.L vs. BRK-BCW8G.L vs. ^FCHICW8G.L vs. PE500.PACW8G.L vs. SP5L.LCW8G.L vs. AUEG.LCW8G.L vs. BRK-ACW8G.L vs. VOO
Often compared with INFR.L:
INFR.L vs. DPGT.LINFR.L vs. IWDA.LINFR.L vs. IUIT.LINFR.L vs. ARCK.LINFR.L vs. FWRG.LINFR.L vs. IDWR.LINFR.L vs. WUTI.L

Return for Risk

CW8G.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CW8G.L
CW8G.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CW8G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CW8G.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CW8G.LINFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.74
1.55

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.74
2.19

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.27

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

3.13

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.91

7.96

+7.95

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CW8G.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CW8G.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CW8G.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CW8G.LINFR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

1.55

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.62

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.61

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.52

+0.47

Drawdowns

CW8G.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CW8G.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW8G.L and INFR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CW8G.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.60%

-34.25%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-5.19%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-11.08%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.88%

-22.87%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.60%

-26.75%

+1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-3.70%

+3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-6.12%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.04%

-0.36%

Volatility

CW8G.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) is 2.55%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that CW8G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CW8G.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

3.92%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

8.92%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

10.49%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

12.26%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

14.10%

+0.35%

CW8G.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CW8G.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CW8G.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

CW8G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CW8G.L
Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		2.82%2.97%2.96%3.02%2.54%2.60%2.84%2.70%2.99%3.51%3.45%4.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

CW8G.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CW8G.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CW8G.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

CW8G.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. CW8G.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CW8G.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CW8G.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer